2y ago

FDA proposes ban on additive found in sodas

www.cnn.com

FDA proposes ban on additive found in sodas | CNN

The US Food and Drug Administration has proposed revoking its regulation authorizing the nationwide use of brominated vegetable oil, or BVO, as an additive in food.

The FDA’s decision comes after California banned the ingredient in October by passing the California Food Safety Act, the first state law in the United States to ban brominated vegetable oil. The additive is already banned in Europe and Japan.

“The agency concluded that the intended use of BVO in food is no longer considered safe after the results of studies conducted in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health … found the potential for adverse health effects in humans,” said James Jones, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for human foods, in a statement.

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related @lemmy.world

MicroWave @lemmy.world

2y ago

FDA proposes ban on additive found in sodas

www.cnn.com /2023/11/02/health/brominated-vegetable-oil-ban-fda-proposal-wellness/index.html

49 comments

- Let's not get ahead of ourselves
- In one of thousands of positions.
- The FDA is maybe thinking about possibly becoming interested in catching up to EU food standards.
  Fixed.
- Just because the EU does something first doesn't mean they were right to
  
  Aside from a few World Wars, they've been right more often than the US.
  
  Erroring on the side of public safety seems a whole lot better than erroring on the side of companies only interested in profit.
  
  Don't worry about the downvote, this is true, especially with their harder stances against GMOs and nuclear power that are based on fearmongering rather than science. We need GMOs and nuclear to reduce climate change.
  That said, this isn't a comment on whether or not BVOs are bad, just that the EU banning something isn't alone a reason to ban it here
For anyone else curious, it was in there as an emulsifier, particularly for citrus flavor oils.
These days it's mainly found in generic branded products, such as Walmart's Mountain Lightning. Mountain Dew is one of the more recent big brand names to remove it, back in 2020.
Interesting case from the Wikipedia:
There are case reports of adverse effects associated with excessive consumption of BVO-containing products. One case reported that a man who consumed two to four liters of a soda containing BVO on a daily basis experienced memory loss, tremors, fatigue, loss of muscle coordination, headache, and ptosis of the right eyelid, as well as elevated serum chloride. In the two months it took to correctly diagnose the problem, the patient also lost the ability to walk. Eventually, bromism was diagnosed and hemodialysis was prescribed which resulted in a reversal of the disorder.
- That case sounds crazy... I am not the healthiest of people, but who can drink 2 or more liters a day every day? Sucks that it happened, but I guess it is good that we found all these terrible things it does as well? I just wonder how it affects people in moderation. Does it really do anything in low doses over long periods of time, or would it be harmless? Of course, why even find out if it can just not be used...
  
  It's a form of self-medication. More than likely these people need a diagnosis of who-knows-what.
  
  When I still drank pop regularly, my rate of buying it was 2 12 packs of cans every other day, so a 12 pack of 355ml per day, or about 3.8L. I'd just have them by my desk and when one ran out, I'd grab one of the other flavour and just alternate all day. I'm not really sure how I didn't end up diabetic or obese because pop was my main drink when I wasn't getting drunk for almost a decade after leaving home and being in charge of my own habits. I kept that 3.8L peak going for a couple of years until information about HFCS and then sugar in general started my journey from pop to juice then to mostly just water.
  
  It was in Gatorade and other sports drinks for a long time, and athletes probably drink more of that while also pushing their bodies to more extremes than the rest of us, and I didn't see any evidence of harm going on there when I was looking up what BVO was.
  The body is really great at removing both things, but with any substance, too much can exceed an organ's capacity to desk with it. Even water is deadly (very painfully, too) if you drink too much too fast. Your cells will burst from osmsosis. Brain cells are especially susceptible. It's called hyponatremia.
- And that's why you don't eat or drink huge amounts of any one thing. Sounds like smaller amounts, even daily, would be perfectly tolerable by most people.
  There's a guy who drank up to 4L of Earl Grey tea every day until he developed muscle and eye problems. Or the guy who ate a bag of black licorice every day until he had a heart attack and died.
  
  Exactly. Most things we can handle from time to time. It’s constant exposure that tends to make most things problematic.
Good. Ban dyes, too. IDGAF if my cola is brown. IDGAF if my mountain dew is the color of radioactive piss.
- Coke should be in the clear it should be using caramel colour. For green there's chlorophyll copper complexes, for yellow tumeric. No it won't look radioactive but who the fuck cares.
  ...it's not like food producers aren't using colouring in the EU, it's that they're going "oh here is what we have, let's see what we can do with that" and not "here's a colour chart, marketing wants it to look like this, make it work with ridiculous amounts of chemistry that's never been tested on animals much less humans who cares where the chips fall they won't fall this financial quarter".
  
  I'm not concerned for health. It's unnecessary. It is added to give the drinks a color. Just cut it out, even if it costs almost nothing.
- We will have a grade school children uprising when all their candy stops being bright orange, green, and blue.
  
  The most valid argument against my position, right here.
Clearly companies have been able to make the sodas just fine without it, so even if it isn't very harmful, it seems best not to include it. Food additives are like software bloat, the more you have, the more attack surface (in this case, possibility albeit small chance of undiscovered health problems) you get, so one should only use what actually is useful
But isnt that what plants crave?
- Looks like it's back to drinking out of the toilet for me
Mountain dew has brominated vegetable oil in it in case u were wondering what products.
- Only if you're drinking a old bottle. It hasn't been an ingredient for years.
  
  Just checked the label, and you are correct. There is no BVO in Mt Dew.
  
  How many years?
Are we just glossing over the job title, "Deputy Commissioner of Human Foods"?
- Seems reasonable. I imagine foods for human consumption and animal consumption require different specialties.
- Hmm, Human Foods... I like it!
- Kind of a badass title for weird titles.
"Found in"...? I think you mean "put into".
- For fucks sake
Mmmmm... bromine!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromine
- It's not as straightforward as that. There is chlorine in your food in the form of sodium chloride aka table salt. How something is bonded can change its properties. Not saying there isn't merit to their claim, just that it's more complicated.
  
  Definitely this, you can drink H2O no problem, but H2O2 and you're going to have a bad time. And yes, probably no need to have brominated vegetable oil in our food at all.
  Some popular drinks that contain BVO include Gatorade, Mountain Dew, Fanta Orange, Fresca, Squirt, Sunkist Pineapple, and some flavors of Powerade.
  Yeah all of these are killing you with sugar, too
  
  Great point, and I encourage everyone to look up the difference between the fluoride in toothpaste and the extremely toxic acid the US puts in our drinking water.
  It's banned in the EU, Japan, and a bunch of other industrialized countries who have identical rates of tooth decay, but statistically significantly lower rates of ovarian cists and low male testosterone (among other things)
  The elements don't matter, the molecules most certainly do

49 comments