I recently had to work with XSLT (may it's inventor burn in hell for their crimes).
That's pretty much programming in XML. It's probably the worst possible thing.
75 0 ReplyXSLT is fine
If you have a program generate it
31 0 ReplySadly, it was done manually. I had to migrate it to this brand new bleeding edge technology, Apache Velocity. That's not great either, but it's much less terrible than XSLT.
For that task I had to learn two templating languages at the same time to port it from one to the other. Wasn't an easy task.
24 0 ReplyPff. I know someone who generated programs using XSLT.
2 0 Reply
Can't even imagine. I've got fed up by the short time I had to configure Maven in plain xml...
9 0 ReplyIs there another way?
2 0 Reply
This is not HTML. It isn't even XML. It's not as bad as designers putting "code" into ads, but it's close.
Also, ever heard of XSLT?
63 0 ReplyI mean it's valid XML
It's just not useful
26 0 ReplyIt isn't valid XML. No root node.
36 0 Reply
This reminds me of Apple plist files, which appear to have been invented by someone that doesn't know how XML works.
24 0 ReplyWhich is true for the majority of all XML files I've ever come across in the wild.
9 0 ReplyI think XML only makes sense if your data is heavily tree-like
4 0 Reply
What even are those?
8 0 Reply
You should check out this new project, supposed to be twice as fast as HTML. It's called XHTML.
17 0 ReplyI thought that was the HTML used by Twitter.
3 0 Reply
No.
17 0 ReplyI will never understand how XML came into being when lisp already existed.
12 0 ReplyI don't either)))))))))
26 0 Reply(reminds (it (of (story me))))
13 0 Reply10 0 ReplyWould you really rather see
<\Foo>
than)
?There's a reason why most popular languages use
}
rather thanend if
orfi
. The added verbosity doesn't actually help people read your code more than e.g. indentation or editors with paren matching or rainbow parens.1 0 Reply
Which of these wonderful languages is this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category%3AXML-based_programming_languages
12 0 ReplyIs it just me, or does the append statement not indicate where you are appending the "number" element to?
10 0 ReplyMeanwhile in APL, you just
20 50 60 90, 10
9 0 ReplyWho ever designed this deserves to be killed.
5 0 Replysomeone should make lisp but with html syntax
3 0 ReplyWhat color theme is that?
3 0 ReplyLooks like Vampire.
2 0 Reply