Bible and Quran apps flagged NSFW by F-Droid
Bible and Quran apps flagged NSFW by F-Droid
forum.f-droid.org
NSFW flag incorrectly added to Bible and Quran apps
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/686773
18 comments
-
-
Define "incorrectly"
-
...so then these sisters get super horny, get their elderly father drunk, and repeatedly rape him until they get pregnant and give birth to their own brothers.
It's the holiest of books.
-
Exposing children to these books and telling then it's reality, is child abuse.
And at the same time, people who believe these books, are banning other, more harmless books. You're ridiculous.
-
I've never read the quran but the bible is absolutely nsfw and anyone who disagrees hadn't read the damned thing
-
Good.
-
Its kind of funny, but if thats the threshold for NSFW then basically any fediverse or wiki app on F-Droid needs to be marked as NSFW...
Maybe add an antifeature for "cult content" :D
-
Probably does. That being said most fediverse and Wikipedia do not feature stories of young teens getting their father drunk to pass on the genes after seeing their mother turned to salt because some angels got lost in rapesville.
-
Wikipedia has literally anything you can imagine on it, so of course it does have that. Just the article about the bible itself probably contains all the fucked up things that appear in the bible.
And the fediverse has every kind of porn from incest to zoophilia on it.
-
-
I think the line is drawn if the content is contained in the app itself. Fediverse/Wiki apps are more like a browser. If you choose to visit a "NSFW" mastodon instance that is between you and the instance, not F-Droid.
-
-
That's bullshit. Other atheists can be so fucking stupid when the Bible is brought up. Can't ever discuss it because it's fiction even though we can write 1000 page essays on Bloodborne lore. Shakespeare is a bunch of people putting humanity into some stories and we appreciate that but because morons created religion that means the Bible is useless.
And the "Bible has rape, obviously it's bad, duh!!" shit. Just change it to "LGBT book has rape, ban it!" and join your people. What's the point of leaving religion when you're so dogmatic? You're literally built to be a crusader. Posers.
-
The difference is in the endorsement of horrible behaviour. So, if the same horrible things were encouraged in an LGBTQ+ book, I would expect it to get the same response as what the bible is getting.
-
Endorsement? Or depictions?
It's historical fiction. The Bible predates religion: straight from the cult era. Christians, Muslims, and Jews are just dingle berries stuck to our cultural relics. These books belong to secular people. And since when are secular people using this stuff to promote rape?
For that reason, plus being against such puritan attitudes toward content, is why I think censoring this stuff is bullshit.
People are going to stoop to hyper literal interpretations of a NSFW label and ignore the subject of censrshp... Because religious people suck? I get it, but this is our shit. Fuck what they say or think about our fiction.
-
-
-
18 comments
Yes, most religious content is not appropriate to discuss at work. As it should be
Unless of course you happen to know the one, true God, then you're bound to try to help others see the light and even abuse a potential position of authority to do so:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-allow-federal-workers-promote-religion-workplaces-2025-07-28/