no logic

Oh there's logic all right

so AI is white :D?
- AI is largely coded and trained by rich white dudes in Silicon Valley. Then fed racially biased material, I don’t know what you were expecting.
  Even before the current “AI”, machine learning would do racist shit all the time. Like when Apple Photos would tag the faces of black people and ask “Is this a dog?”
  There’s also an ongoing discussion about how the color balance on almost every digital camera ever made favors light skin over dark skin.
- You were expecting black mechahitler?
- Remember the response to Deepseek? They aren't universally pro-AI, they want American technocrats to be the ones who control the AI that they feel will eventually take over the world.
  There was quite a bit of "racism" or at the very least fearmongering when Deepseek was released.

Oh that's really easy: AI isn't brown.

Never underestimate the Americans' capacity for racism. A lot of things in America can be explained by racism.

Can we manipulate AI to have a middle eastern accent?
- I'd recommend a Mexican accent for best results, but probably yes.
- “Hallo my frend, how are you today, ah? I am very heppy to see you, inshalla we have very good time, yes?”
  That works is seems, but you have to get access to someone's account to add it to the custom instructions.
Yeap.... Imo the reason why so many of the worst people in America are so obsessed with AI is because they think it will solve the age old problem of population decline without having to import brown people for labour.

Because rich people make more money when AI does it.

Rich people make money by hiring cheap immigrant labour, too.
They can also pay immigrants less and give them worse deal

Because rich people get richer and nobody is giving money to the browns.

Don't know about that. The Browns generated an estimated $685 million in revenue from the 2025 season according to Google's shitty AI. They did have an operating cost of about $90 million though. Admittedly I don't know if it's a lot for an american football team, but someone must've given them money.
- (•̀⤙•́)

Immigrants are poor. AI is owned by rich white men.

In both cases, no one is taking our jobs. The ruling class is using both immigrants and AI to suppress our wages.

AI or any other technology is good because doing more work with less people is the reason our living standards are higher than 100 years ago.

Immigrants that work and pay taxes is also good.

Yes but AI implementations currently don't do that. They just make people lose jobs because it makes it cheaper for companies.
And also AI and automation is jot taking over dangerous and unhealthy manual jobs but it's taking over programming and graphic design kinda jobs.
- They just make people lose jobs because it makes it cheaper for companies.
  Yes, that's what happens when technological advances hit an already saturated market. The problem here is that, due to this baby, the fruits of all this automation are going to the owner class rather than the working class.
- Yes but AI implementations currently don't do that. They just make people lose jobs because it makes it cheaper for companies.
  They just make people lose their jobs because idiots believe they make it cheaper for companies"*
- And what exactly do they make cheaper?
TIL AI was invented in the mid 80s
- well it's an ancient condept and really in the form of computers the theory began in the 1940s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_intelligence
  The field of "artificial intelligence research" was founded as an academic discipline in 1956.

Just give it time, you'll get anti-AI opportunists who target small business owners eventually.

We already see anti-AI backlash in businesses that want to shove the tools down workers' throats.
The big difference is that workers in the US have no real power. If you want to be a proper ultra-nationalist in America, you better own something and it better be big enough to fund the solicitation of a few congresscritters. The response to anti-AI activism is to call the critiques "Luddites" (or perhaps Russia/China disinformation agents). The response to anti-migrant activism is to nod sagely and insist the white working class needs to pick more cantaloupes for $5/hr.

I don't have a lot of conversations with the "immigrants are taking our jobs" people. Are those same people really talking about AI killing jobs being good? Because that doesn't seem right.

I don't think they are. I think these are two different groups within the same "side".
What colour is the AI? Thats the crucial part.

Immigrants have non-white skin and AI doesn't even have skin, which is more preferable because I'm an irrational stupid racist that loves bootlicking rich oligarchs. Hail Corporate!

You can't be a proper racist. Some of the words you used have more than four syllables and you haven't misspelt the name of your own country even once.

AI is made by white people while most immigrants are brown.

Checkmate.

It might be owned by white people but you should read the names of people in lead technical roles and writing research papers. I promise you will have a hard time pronouncing most of the names haha.
- While I totally agree with you, have you ever tried yourself at Polish names? And I think they are mostly white ;0)
Don't worry, the next project will probably put the immigrants into slavery, then they'll both be legal AND owned by white people.

Because if AI takes your job then eventually a billionaire gets to be a trillionaire.

Uhhhhh the economy or something

To be fair immigrant AIs from China and Europe also aren't allowed in America.

because it serves the rich well that people are easily baited into fearing and fighting minorities

the rich do not want you mad at AI becanuse that is their product

It's good if housing and stocks go up but it's bad if salaries and the price of stuff go up. Because it widens the gap between the haves and the have nots.

Just salaries. They like it when prices go up because they own the businesses selling things, and because it forces people to invest in their stocks.

The republicans haven’t figured out a way to be racist towards AI yet, that’s all.

The republicans haven’t figured out a way to be racist towards clankers yet, that’s all.
Fixed that for you
- Touché

Easy, when foreign workers take the money, it leaves the USA. When it's an American AI company getting that money instead of an American worker, the money stays in the country.

Plus, the administration hates foreigners and loves technology. Seems consistent, at least.

Easy, when foreign workers take the money, it leaves the USA.
Day laborers taking their fistful of loose change in wages and driving 300 miles back across the border to buy a sandwich.
Damn shame the labor performed by these workers doesn't stick around in the US economy in any way, either. All those houses and office buildings they assemble, the plumbing they fix, the foodstuffs they collect for retail sale, the electronics repairs, the meals they prep, the nursing they provide, the child care... all goes right back over the border with them as soon as they day is over.

Capitalism

Both seem bad tbh

Both are fine so long as we have a complete land value tax funding direct economic redistribution

If all people look alike it's easier to pretend that there is no systemic exploitation.

This is very simple. Your ambitions of being an artist were always completely irresponsible no matter how talented you may be. As your parents told you, be more realistic and aim for a strawberry picking career.

Now everyone can be happy! AI gets money to make Skynet for Israel, and you get to sneak an occasional nice fresh straberry into your cunt hole, if the AI is not looking.

Florida tried to force your children to replace immigrants in the strawberry fields, but fortunately this has remained an adult exclusive carreer opportunity, and we don't yet need to cannibalize those uppity children for stealing your jobs.

Gah… derp!