Why does have to be this way?
Why does have to be this way?
Rolling, rolling, rolling back nothing I love more than communicating why we had to roll back again (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ
Question 1: Where's the CI/CD pipeline?
Question 2: Why can one person change production alone without peer review (outside of an emergency)?You don't have a job, you have a ticking time bomb.
It's internal development (Portugal) developing something for an internal department (Germany). There's nothing professional going on here so we are far from any ci/cd pipeline. One person can change everything, because it's just two developers (1 frontend, 1 backend).
Plus things are busy and we (team in Germany) are way more interested in this thing working well than they (team in Portugal) are since they have higher priority tasks..
Of course I can say fuck it and live with the poor quality caused by circumstances that were partially caused by poor management decisions of the company but I'm not able to care little enough.
I demand CI/CD for my scripts. If it runs in prod or against prod or anywhere near prod, it gets a pipeline.
Technical maturity isn't just for big companies and important things. It's a practice. Why half-ass something when you could whole ass it?
If you have tests you have to automate them and have a pipeline which stops any deployments when these tests fail. You definitely have a mindset issue and not a management or tool issue. I am not sorry but as a DevOps Engineer I can only say you guys are a lousy hack and should probably seek a different job.
It doesn't have to be that way, if you have a CI/CD process that prevents it.
Why kind of psychos are merging with failing tests?
The kinds of psychos that work at companies that measure performance by number of commits and PRs, successful or not.
That explains why vibe coding is so popular… just commit after every iteration the LLM spits out
the real question is why doesn't the CI/CD prevent merging with failing tests in the first place. i have not worked in any company that allowed that for at least 15 years.
The kind of psychos that have “nice to have” tests. If it’s red, it’s not critical, but still worthy of attention… sometime.
You guys get to test?
because they know better than your tests obv.
Proper procedure would have been the dev updating the uts so that they pass. If all they updated was adding ignore or commenting out code in the ut, even better!