Tech tweaked ahead of rollout in July, Mozilla and Apple still not interested
Google has stated it plans to address developers’ concerns by “making web publishers promise not to abuse the API”.
Google’s new browser-based tracking functionality available via their “Topics API” has sparked numerous concerns recently, including fear that the heightened communication of web browser history could lead to “fingerprinting attacks” which could be used to track users across devices by profiling recent web history.
When prompted with this issue, Google started their short-term solution is to have web developers who enroll in the new Topics API platform take pledge that they will not abuse the new tool, whatever that means.
I've never understood the logic of people who switched to Chrome from Firefox.
Mozilla has an overpaid CEO, so let's switch to a browser that's run by one of the richest companies on the planet.
Firefox broke some extension, so let's switch to a browser that has an even worse extension model.
Firefox shows client side ads that are easily disabled, so let's switch to a browser actually run by an ad tech company.
Firefox changed the UI to look like Chrome (and they hate the design), so I guess switch to Chrome?
Daily reminder that Firefox is customizable to the point of removing Mozilla's telemetry and making it look and feel almost like Chromium. And no, de-Googled Chromium probably isn't enough because preliminary code for implementing WEI has been pushed upstream (basically they added the code which makes it possible for WEI to be implemented, strongly suggesting they're intending to actually implement it upstream and not in Chrome)
Another vote for Firefox. Just switched over from chromium based, and i could easily port over all my info and bookmarks and shit, and it feels great to not support a monopoly
Wow, that's so safe. Nothing more safer than the world's biggest advertising company having full access to my internet history.
It's just so dystopian almost, that these things that are objectively bad are named things that sound good, like Enhanced Safe Browsing, Topics API, Web Environment Integrity, etc
Google is likely asking them to not abuse it just to cover its own arse, to create that plausible denial that the API was not "supposed" to be used for fingerprinting. It smells bullshit from a distance.