I've always heard it called the "Lost Cause Of The South" by racist rednecks; they seem to be aware enough (or someone was, whoever it is they're parroting) to attempt to distance it as much as possible from terminology that associates it with slavery because otherwise it looks even worse. Even though slavery is absolutely what it was all about.
Huh. I always took the term “lost cause” at face value, and thought it simply meant that the confederacy was hopeless and doomed to fail. I didn’t realize it was based on hypocrisy and lies. Thanks for the heads up!
Edit: the more I read that Wikipedia page, the angrier I get
Part of it is also the constant push to try to weave the principles of confederacy into the fabric of American history via monuments and memorials, to build up this idea that the confederacy is part of the modern American identity rather than antithetical to it.
See for example the recent controversy surrounding the military installation called Fort Bragg. Braxton Bragg was a slave-owning confederate general who, by all accounts, was not even a good leader. But given the fort's location in North Carolina, one of the former confederate states, it got its name presumably due to local military officials sympathetic to the "Lost Cause" narrative, and stuck until just recently.
In 2023, the Biden administration pushed to change the name of the fort to "Fort Liberty" so as to continue removing these Lost Cause memorials and end this myth, but this year the Trump administration just recently renamed it back to Fort Bragg, ostensibly now named after a different Bragg who was just a paratrooper during World War II. But no one is fooled by what they're trying to do.
It's almost sad, really, just how badly they're clinging to this myth even today. But I guess more scary than sad, given that half of the government is essentially run by traitors. And it's really been that way for a long time now I suppose, but shocking how strongly they still choose to hold their ground on these ridiculous narratives when pushed.
Can you explain that a little more? I'm guessing you meant secession, but even then I don't get what you mean. Like, they seceded but the topic would be about WHY they did that.
I had struggled with AP Euro in high school and had decided to just take regular US history the following year. Absolute mistake. My teacher was the football coach and was a huge proponent for the ‘states rights’ BS. This was in one of the better funded school districts in SoCal.