What the other guy said is not exactly correct.
So while they are both China, both claim that the other is the illegitimate government of China. The long of the short is that during the tail end of world war II communist forces rallied and drove out the Japanese from mainland China and Manchuria. They forced the capitalist government forces literally into the ocean and they retreated to Taiwan after they invaded it and took it over from the locals.
They have been a government in exile since the end of world war II. They claim to be the official Chinese government. Basically imagine if instead of a country called China it was Mom and Dad are fighting and dad has been exiled to the shed where he now lives. And Mom kept the kids and still has the house. And because he has full autonomy over his shed, he's able to produce all these fancy little projects that his neighbor down the street. The United States loves to buy from him. In exchange for all those great services, his neighbor down the street has helped him renovate that tiny shed into a nice tiny home.
We are committed to the plan
I like the wall in the center so I can hang torches off of it. That and the glass roof mod. Let me make greenhouses that are very effective.
I feel you are misunderstanding me. I am not asking about hypotheticals where the police lie. I am saying that in a hypothetical where YOU can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt.
It's not about rehabilitation or punishment. It's about logistics. If there is a dog that repeatedly attacks other people, children and dogs and rehabilitation has failed. The only recourse would be to terminate that dog as it is unsafe for society for the dog to be allowed out. Sure, you could build a secure containment facility to house your inmate dog but at what cost. At that point you are then taking resources that could be better spent to help people in need to contain a problem that will not be solved. I am actually in agreement with you that it's a far crueler punishment to keep somebody alive in a non autonomous position that they would hate.
Would you be for a death penalty in cases where you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the person that is accused is the perpetrator? And by shadow of a doubt, I am not referring to the very loose standards that most law enforcement relies on. I mean that the person was caught in the act.
su root
cd ~
chown * root
mv usr/ussr/ usr/gulag/
cd usr/gulag/
touch treason.txt
touch you_and_siberia_and_stalin.txt
chown usr/gulag/ 111
If you make square rooms that are 21x21 you can support it with a single pillar in the center/wall.
