my thoughts on how time works in star trek
my thoughts on how time works in star trek
specifically paradoxes.
Ignoring the one instance of branched time that I know of (the Kelvin timeline), assuming that the prime universe has a single dynamic timeline (considering all the times Voyager reset the timeline):
my thoughts are time travel creates a permanent linkage between two points in the timeline.
- The linkage stores all changes caused by the time travel.
- Linkages are vulnerable to paradoxes.
- Too much paradox stress causes the linkage to rot and break. (like an old rope?)
- If a linkage breaks, all changes it caused are naturally lost, thus the timeline self corrects.
I haven't seen much around about how paradoxes would physically work. this just came to mind and makes the most sense to me, I'm curious if something like this has been explored before?
very simple illustration below, black line is the main timeline, red line is a linkage created by time travel:
When we talk about time travel in fictional universes, almost all of the narratives follow one of three "truths:"
Moreso, the mirror universe is a parallel to our own, marching along at the same pace and whose characters are developing at the same rate as the prime timeline. So, there is no prime timeline, and no multiverse. Just the clean-shaven and the goatee universes.
And to answer your question: yes, I think Trek trends toward a "prime" timeline. It's honestly the way our brains work. With all the posturing of the wormhole aliens, we just don't work in a non-linear fashion. And maybe more importantly, good stories don't work that way either, Kurt Vonnegut aside. Time travel is wearing plot armor in EVERY movie and show because no one has a handle on it.
Thank you for bringing this up. It's something I think about too much.
in reality it's all a big ball of timey wimey wibbly wobbly stuff