Is it worth the trouble with an Nvidia card?

If you've already got an Nvidia card, there's no sense in going out and buying a new one just for Linux. Just make sure you choose a distro that explicitly supports Nvidia out of the box.

I started with Nvidia as well and then just got AMD at the next upgrade.

I have a laptop and a desktop with a GTX 1060 that run fine, and another laptop with a GTX 1050ti that is also great. Running Arch with KDE and Wayland. No problems.

I've never needed to do more then sudo apt install nvidia-driver, after that it Just Works™.

debian btw

I have an RTX 3080 Ti working beautifully on EndeavourOS (Arch based).

I haven't done any research into GPUs on Linux in awhile. I wasn't aware nvidia finally released an open source driver. Looks like it's recommended for the 3080. Seems like this was a fairly recent development so you may have more luck?

Boycott Nvidia, their new cards are just overpriced hardware keys to fixing their software.

I've been running Fedora for over a year now with an Nvidia 4090 RTX with no major problems. I can think of one game (Path of Exile 2) where I needed to make a minor configuration tweak to get it working.

I had a 3070 and now I upgraded to a 4070 ti super and havent had issues with either. Maybe I got lucky but I never understood all the negative views on nvidia and Linux.

I just stick to AMD, especially on Linux. The official AMD driver is open source on Linux, included in mainline kernel, and performance is better than their Windows diver now

I daily drive Linux, gaming quite a bit and I have a 3080.

There are occasional annoyances, for example when I wake from suspend one of my monitors doesn't activate until I change display settings (which I do now with a script bound to a hotkey, though a fix is in the pipe). Most of the time it doesn't cause me any issues.

I've kept a Windows install on a partition as a backup in case I have real compatibility issues but I haven't booted it in weeks (even then, it was to play an anti cheat game, nothing NVIDIA related).

I use Hyprland (on Arch, btw) so I'm technically using unsupported software but I have had no major issues.

On the plus side, I can run local AI easily and DLSS/DLAA, to me, produce higher quality results and with less overhead. Ray tracing is technically in the plus column but most of the time I'd rather just have higher FPS than the visual quality.

I don't have HDR gaming just yet (my biggest complaint) because gamescope likes to crash, assuming it launches in the first place. However, a Wayland update is going to fix this imminently (next major release) so you can get HDR without gamescope.

Basically, there were trying times in the past but currently (assuming you're using current versions of things and not some LTS release from a year ago) it's largely a smooth experience.

Don't buy nvidia. Intel and AMD opensourced their drivers and, more importantly, care for their customer needs. And i am talking about gaming customers.

The only thing nvidia cares about is AI and lots of money.

They lie to their customers (fake frames, paperlaunch) und neglect the gaming needs in favor of AI.

And, after all, AMD does not use 12V high power connectors, just simple, non burning, dual 8 pins

It’s much better these days - at least it works fine on arch and fedora. I wouldn’t worry about nvidia on Linux. That said, I’d go AMD for another reason - $. There’s just no reason to spend the kind of money nvidia wants when you can get something just a tad slower for 1/4 the price. AMD makes cards that can drive a huge monitor at high fps.

Bottom line: whatever is fine.

Linux Mint, a 3090 and zero problems

AMD is ideal but Nvidia is fine. Basically any game that would work on AMD will work on Nvidia (only exception I know of is the VR mode of Phasmophobia edit: apparently this was fixed ~1yr ago). Gamepass still won't work though - blame Microsoft for that one.

That said, Nvidia has more of a performance hit when switching. Ancient Gameplays recently did a video comparing Nobara vs Windows 11, with both the RX 7900XTX and the RTX 4080 Super. These were his average results across 20 games:

RX 7900XTX: 1080p +2%, 1440p +0%, 4k -2.2%

RTX 4080S: 1080p -13.8%, 1440p -13%, 4k -10.2%

So your games will work. They just might run 10%-15% slower until you can snag an AMD card. If you're interested in fully committing, looks like most used 3080s are going for ~$500 on ebay, so you could probably get an AMD card and get most of your money back.

I got a 3080 and I have not encountered any issues on the latest drivers, released a few days ago.

Before that, I had a minor issue (artifacts) on some websites when on a high refresh rate. Fixed with latest drivers.

My next card is going to be nvidia, too.

A couple years ago I swore off Nvidia on principle. For periods things would seem fine but updates would randomly break games and other things. Sold that card and got an amd haven't seen that issue since.

I have a 7900 XTX. It just works™.

I just did a new build with AMD 9800X3D and RTX 5080. I’ve been dual booting Win 11 and Nobara. I haven’t done direct head to head benchmarks but Deep Rock Galactic, Deep Rock Survivor, Satisfactory, Skyrim, Atomic Heart all have run fine on Nobara.

The big difference I’ve noticed is Cyberpunk 2077. For whatever reason the AI frame generation tool doesn’t seem to work on Nobara so max FPS is around 65-70 with max raytracing/graphics settings. On Windows I got around 75+ and with the AI frame generation it goes up to 180 (I realize this is not a feature that some people like, please just realize I’m reporting my testing results).

Now all of that said, there is this weird jitteriness along the edges of objects with rapid camera movement in Cyberpunk on Windows, even at 180 fps, that isn’t there on Nobara. So even though the objective frame rate is much lower on Nobara, it actually feels much smoother and nicer.

¯\(ツ)/¯

I'm using Garuda with Nvidia and it's been painless. I do feel like a get a little less performance, but it's been good enough to keep me happy.

I'm using endeavourOS with Nvidia 4090 with proprietary drivers and it works fine for most games without tinkering. For issues with Linux gaming you can check protonDB. Steam, lutris and heroic game launchers are doing wonders for a big portion of the gaming options on Linux. I wouldn't change the 3080 with AMD if I were you.

I have been using a 1080TI for years on Linux. It works fine for the most part. If I am going to build a new system which I am planning to do. I would avoid it.

I've been doing almost all of my gaming on Linux for 2 years now, running a 5800X3D and an RTX 3080.

Why the "almost"? I love to fly flight simulators, mostly DCS World, in VR and am still using an HP Reverb G2 (Windows) headset.

Everything else works without issues on Linux for me. I've been sitting on Pop!_OS 22.04 but if I were to install today, I'd go for Linux Mint

The lack of VRR support while running multiple monitors by Nvidia was the deal breaker for me for a long time. However, I have been running the 570 beta drivers for a couple weeks now, and it just works. Not sure why it took them so long. I am very happy to be back on linux.

Don't get a 50 series card. If you must upgrade I'd go for a second hand 40xx. But honestly with a 3080 you're perfectly fine for now if you're not married to ultra 4k 144hz.

I'm on a 3070 and it does fine for most games. That said I don't play a lot of AAA titles but the ones I do play fine at medium or high settings mostly.

Also I used to dual boot, but since about a year I moved to 100% Linux and have only had the occasional issue. Mint with Nvidia send l seems to work pretty well these days.

To me, Nvidia isn't worth the trouble on Linux unless you have specific (non-gaming) needs that can't be met with AMD or Intel hardware.

With this in mind, I kept using my last Nvidia card until it needed replacing, and then switched to AMD. Seems like that might make sense for you, too.

Try Linux Mint or CachyOS, most will work out of the box also Nvidia graphics cards.