Google Pixel 4a’s ruinous “Battery Performance” update is a bewildering mess
Google Pixel 4a’s ruinous “Battery Performance” update is a bewildering mess
It’s hard to say why Google is doing this instead of a recall.
AI Summary:
The article discusses the issues with Google's Pixel 4a battery update. The update has caused drastically reduced battery life for many users, with some experiencing only two hours of charge. Google has offered three options for affected users: a battery replacement, $50, or $100 in Google Store credit. However, the update has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the inconvenience it has caused. Additionally, the update was built on a personal machine, not the proper build system, and has led to confusion and frustration among users.
Recently had a Pixel 5 and sold it after Google stopped support after just 3 years. Ghoulish company. Very happy with my new iPhone.
My pixel 4a was affected by that update. I ended up buying a new phone. I don't even want to install something like Graphene os. So many privacy-based limitations I don't really need. And I have no desire to try Lineage OS. All I wanted is to have a functional phone. I can't trust google long-term hardware reliability. They don't even gave an explanation. I don't think that I will consider any Google hardware in nearest future.
For all people reading this: there are zero privacy-based limitations with GrapheneOS.
Yeah, i think its awesome and liberating to be more in control of my phone. I am rocking it for over a year now and haven't had any major issues yet (I had more issues with the stock software of my Xiaomi I had previously). Except for some nasty apps (like some banking apps) everything works flawlessly for me!
And not android either. My phone is different and lately the battery is just not lasting like even a 4th of what it was new.
I gave my old 4a to my father who enjoyed it tremendously. This bullshit update ruined the phone for him. Battery replacement helped but I really don't see how such updates are okay to push for a company this big. They know there are two types of batteries and one of those can't handle the update, because they've sent a warning to those phones. Maybe just don't push the update to those phones instead?
Why do that when they can finally force people off their halfway-decent hardware in favor of their latest crap? I had a 4a and liked it, worked fine for my purposes. When it crapped out i just got another 4a. Eventually the newer one started boot-looping intermittently and i decided it was time to upgrade to something more "modern". After spending way too much time researching the current options and cornering myself into options paralysis, i decided maybe the best choice was to "double" my pixel and jump from a 4 to an 8. I figured that many generations difference should provide for a notably better/faster experience. It didn't. I liked the 4a just as much as my 8--only difference being some very small changes in options and menus. Performance-wise it's not opening pages with blazing speed, the 5G doesn't really seem to be any faster than the 4G i had been using on the Pixel 4a. Camera performance is a little better but nothing ground-breaking. I think it's possible i get worse telephone performance, i occasionally get dropped/static-y calls and sometimes can't call at all. Overall i was really disappointed to see my upgrade act more as a lateral move. I probably should have just gotten another 4a when my last one died. Of course, it would probably need a battery now, lol. Or have the boot-loop problem.
Welcome to the future, where the tech is cutting edge but built with the cheapest components possible 🙃
Yeah, I was disappointment when I bought a very expensive Galaxy S22 to replace my old Moto G whose charging port wore out,. The S22 had worse battery life, camera, and no noticeable performance improvements. Recently, my S22 stopped charging, and I just bought a "Mint"-grade used Pixel 6 and installed GrapheneOS on it. Happy so far, and it's nice to be able to block network access to all apps, including Google's.
It’s all about companies making profit, not you and I getting a decent and useable product.
So. Many. Shills.
Graphene Pixel > Stock Pixel > Dumbphone > bloated phones like Galaxy.
I've had all. Nothing beats stock Pixel OS experience. Version 8 and above have 8 years of security updates guaranteed. Show me another company that has delivered this. Google is notorious for killing services/products buy Pixels ain't one of them.
And there is GrapheneOS, unarguably the most secure OS with Pixel 8 and above (lookup internal Cellebrite datableaks concerning breach ability of recent phones)
Sorry if you are on Pixel 4, but even a Pixel 6 w/ GrapheneOS would be a cheap upgrade even though support is ending. If you can get a 7a for a reasonable price you are set for the upcoming years, I can't imagine any other phone offering more.
Calls people shills.
Immediately begins to shill.
I think reading this comment just made me even stupider.
I'm living through this. It sucks. Ive been eyeing s new phone for about six months, but since my wife is still rocking an iPhone 8, I felt it wrong to get one before her. With this, I feel justified getting a new one. Figured I'd get a pixel 9a when it comes out.
Why go with another Pixel after they’ve fucked you over?
Probably to flash it with grapheneOS? The $100, I believe is reserved for a purchase of a Pixel though.
I opted for the battery replacement, but the $50 is an attractive option as well. Apparently the $100 credit won't work if the device you're buying is on sale. I had graphene on mine so I had to flash it back to stock.
Wait, if you had graphene I didn't think you'd get the battery crippling update right? Or are you saying that, even though you had graphene, you decided to get a free battery by reverting to stock, then (I guess) put graphene back?
It's my wifes old phone, she had been complaining about battery life since about a year ago, so we bought her an 8a as an upgrade. I only recently within the past month or so pulled it out and put Graphene on it to see if the battery life was any better (it wasn't) it's possible that the battery update made it into Graphene. I figured I would still get a free brand new battery and use the phone. My current phone is a very cheap Motorola which doesn't have enough ram to keep pages from reloading when you switch between apps.
LMAO I bet you can't name one single feature/product Google released where "transparency" of how it works is a thing, it's almost like anti-transparancy UX design is something they love on a philosophical level, even for features or products that have absolutely nothing to do with advertising lol
I have a still working updated 4a which I use for a second phone account I have because it is so pleasant to carry around. I bought it late in the 4a production cycle and I think it must therefore have a battery that is different in some way to that included with earlier models and that is the reason the update did not brick my phone. I think what happened here is Google knew of a flash bang fault in those batteries which touch on wood later ones did not have so sent a targeted update to hash those specific early devices for safety. The question is not did Google intentionally scupper those phones but when did it know about the fault. My guess is it discovered it during production and that is why later models are altered and now remain usable after the update. The upshot of that is Google had some idea they were faulty very early on but chose not to recall them then but instead only disable them very late in their life. This is just speculation of course, I could just have been lucky and Google could have just recently found some fault with aging batteries.
If there's an issue, explain the issue. Don't brick phones and say "Oh no! Here, pay us money to get a brand new one! We'll cover some cost...after fees are subtracted, of course."
There isn't really an upshot here