Do content creators need to be paid? I guess i just never thought of making YouTube videos as a viable career path. Donations? Fine. But i really think so much of the problem with a giant social-media/video site like YouTube is that when mass creation is monetarily incentivized, it can create a whole industry for garbage videos designed to generate clicks to put money in some bottom-feeders bank accounts. I'm sure it also helps some people out who have no better way of making money or perhaps as much money, so it's not all bad at least.
Maybe I'm just getting too old, but i remember when YouTube first came around and there wasn't a heavy emphasis on self-promotion for ad revenue. The world was a different place then too, and tech was a lot less accessible. Less viewers, less videos, less capabilities for making/editing them as well. I don't know, i just have a hard time justifying the YouTuber as a legitimate occupation. I love some of the creators out there, but i think the ones i enjoy most are doing it because they enjoy making the videos in the first place. I've actually considered making some repair videos to share some of my knowledge on stuff, but the incentive has never been about making any money. Perhaps i would change my tune if i made a video that made me some. I suppose the successful YouTuber has been added to the list of the youths' aspirations alongside the famous musician or athlete or movie star that my generation always dreamed of becoming.
I guess it's just another instance of the inevitability that seems to loom over every aspect of our lives: anything that becomes popular will eventually be turned into a vehicle for advertisement. 🫠
It will never cease to amaze me just how disgustingly depraved our twice-elected president is. He gleefully spent his time doing some of the worst shit a human being could do, and he was up to his eyeballs in this shit for years. It was somehow not enough to disqualify him from gaining the votes of self-proclaimed Christians by the millions. It's really just revealed how much virtue-signaling conservatives have been up to. Party of family, Jesus, and personal responsibility?!? And this is their leader?!?
I'm wondering if some of these companies will start including a chip or capability to "phone home" to a satellite or wireless network that will make their smart TVs "smart" whether you like it or not. I'm sure there would be ways for vigilant people to combat it, but it would seem like something that would go largely un-protested by the majority of people if the past is any indication. I'm sure there are laws around all that, but nowadays laws seem more like suggestions that may be subject to change for the right price...
You raise an excellent point, one which i was hoping to find out more about as well. It turns out Tesla has been working hard to keep pretty much any pertinent information to answer your questions firmly under lock and key.
Unlike other companies reporting to NHTSA, Tesla abuses the right to redact data reported through the system. The automaker redacts the “narrative” for each reported crash, preventing the public from knowing how the crashes happened and who is responsible.
Based on the limited information in Tesla’s reports, we know that one of the new crashes involved a Robotaxi driving into a car backing up, another involved a cyclist, and the last one involved an unknown animal.
So he's basically fudging the numbers and anytime he's questioned he points at the fudged numbers and says everything's great, he's great, now get out of the way while he deploys a fleet of these un-manned deathtraps to "half the US population" according to a properly ultra-super-inflated kind of claim only a douchebag like Leon can make. No, seriously--he actually claimed that by the end of 2025 he'll have these things serving half the population of the US.
All of the Robotaxi crashes so far have occurred with human safety monitors—who have been trained to take control of the car in the event of a software error—present in the vehicles.
This is significant because, as TechCrunch reported on Monday, Tesla is starting to send out its Robotaxi fleet without safety monitors.
So despite a pitiful record with people trying to correct the cars mistakes, they're now ready to move on to running them without assistance?!? I am furious at the idea that our safety on the roads is this negotiable.
Just looking for the next good browser, that's all. Just the same as i was willing to ditch reddit for greener pastures, even with the snarky cunts that came along too lol
I've been using Firefox for longer than i can remember. That said, I'm ready to make the leap if necessary. What's the next browser to succeed Firefox? Suggestions??
My fear is that this is only going to become the new pricing floor. Someone suggested that these companies are going to systematically scoop up nearly all remaining tech in an attempt to sell cloud computing etc as the only option for the average consumer (due to lack of affordable or perhaps even available tech)...
I wouldn't be surprised to find out they don't want us having any access to our own computers etc because they can only control so much of what we can do with them.
I took a copper-foil stained glass beginners course and turned out a pretty nice 1st attempt. Very excited to see what else i can do... Just in the process of gathering the needed tools and materials to start making some pieces in my own little shop...
I've been getting into stained glass lately. The textures and the various "dichroic" styles and swirly colorful patterns on some of them are absolutely amazing. I'm really lucky to live near a giant place that deals specifically in stained glass and it's a treat for the eyes just to look at all the beautiful glass they have there.
My grandmother actually introduced my brother and I to Commander Keen! She was a teacher at the time and had a pretty good grasp on computers when many had never even interacted with one in person. Whenever we went to their house, we always wanted to play on her computer. It made our Nintendo seem like a toy in comparison. She even had some other games too including Quasimodo and another one i could swear was called Arabian or Arabian Nights...
Shareware really was so cool back then 😎 happy memories!
You sure it wasn't one of those "Flatpak" do-it-yourself lightbulb kits? I always thought they sounded a little out of my realm, tbh. Never was very good at assembling models...
I feel like it's a means of creating a further distance between the rich and poor when conventional means have reached their limit, though i imagine there is likely at least some sadistic pleasure they derive from it (and there are very likely some that get a lot)
Here's a comparison that came to mind for me: when i make dinner, i like to make my wife and i a salad but I'll go out of my way to make a very nice presentation of the various ingredients on my wife's salad. I will have the exact same ingredients for mine, but intentionally slop them onto the plate with hasty abandon and even take measures to try to make it look even worse. I like to argue that my wife's salad is the better of the 2, that there is a hierarchy that's immediately distinguishable--even though it's the exact same stuff. That her salad is actually even better than if they both had been presented the same way--that i can make that basic salad even better than previously thought possible by creating a severe inequality in its presentation to the other one. Of course, that's a very harmless comparison but i think there's something in it.
I mean, it's like the rich can only be so pleased with their riches and the luxuries it affords them. Not to mention a lot of that stuff probably becomes trite/commonplace even if it's a giant yacht or fancy food or living space or whatever. They can only be so happy, and sustaining that happiness is probably not easy when you've burned through the conventional happiness-granting activities. It would seem that they find more nuanced, and perhaps even perverted means of pressing the happiness button. I suppose Epstein's Island really kinda drives home that whole disgusting "someone has to suffer in order for me to be happy" kinda dynamic.
It's disgusting to think people derive pleasure from making others suffer like this, but it's not the least surprising to discover. 🫠
Do content creators need to be paid? I guess i just never thought of making YouTube videos as a viable career path. Donations? Fine. But i really think so much of the problem with a giant social-media/video site like YouTube is that when mass creation is monetarily incentivized, it can create a whole industry for garbage videos designed to generate clicks to put money in some bottom-feeders bank accounts. I'm sure it also helps some people out who have no better way of making money or perhaps as much money, so it's not all bad at least.
Maybe I'm just getting too old, but i remember when YouTube first came around and there wasn't a heavy emphasis on self-promotion for ad revenue. The world was a different place then too, and tech was a lot less accessible. Less viewers, less videos, less capabilities for making/editing them as well. I don't know, i just have a hard time justifying the YouTuber as a legitimate occupation. I love some of the creators out there, but i think the ones i enjoy most are doing it because they enjoy making the videos in the first place. I've actually considered making some repair videos to share some of my knowledge on stuff, but the incentive has never been about making any money. Perhaps i would change my tune if i made a video that made me some. I suppose the successful YouTuber has been added to the list of the youths' aspirations alongside the famous musician or athlete or movie star that my generation always dreamed of becoming.
I guess it's just another instance of the inevitability that seems to loom over every aspect of our lives: anything that becomes popular will eventually be turned into a vehicle for advertisement. 🫠