FDA bans use of Red No. 3 dye in food, drinks
FDA bans use of Red No. 3 dye in food, drinks
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is moving to ban the use of Red No. 3 dye in food products.

Sure. Ban Red Dye No. 3, but let's allow all the homeopathic bullshit we want because hey why regulate that stuff? They just give it to kids.
107 0 ReplyMOD: In light of reports related to homeopathy:
There is a studied and demonstrated harm associated with homeopathy. However, claims made in ignorance of this will not be removed as misinformation at this time.
Read more: Adverse effects of homeopathy: a systematic review of published case reports and case series | 2012
43 0 ReplyThey have until 2027?
Lmao, we know this is bad but what's another 2yrs going to hurt...
39 0 ReplyWho numbers all these dyes anyway?
21 0 ReplyDo Red40 next!
18 0 Reply“the link between the dye and cancer does not occur in humans”
So just because it’s carcinogenic in rats means it’s banned. But sure, let’s keep selling cigarettes. This is just a big joke.
16 0 ReplyTo be reversed by Tuesday.
We need more concrete changes.
7 0 ReplyOh no! What about Big Red?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNMq3-mN0JU
EDIT: It's OK, we still have Red 40
4 0 ReplyI thought Red No. 5 was the bad one. I feel like I remember that from somewhere.
3 0 ReplyDon’t worry. It’ll be back on the menu in six days.
3 0 Replyshrug
2 0 Reply