What?? Op-eds can be disagreeable??! This is incredibly irresponsible. What if I just believe every opinion I read? This is so ugly and awful. I can't believe journalists would trust people to draw their own conclusions about a diverse spectrum of opinions!
Typical failing New York Times. So despicable and unethical.
Publishing extremist propaganda calling for war crimes in a newspaper can be waived away because it said (opinion)!
Bomb Syria even if it's illegal (opinion!)
What's next, verbatim Mein Kampf quotes being okay if the article says (opinion)?
Yes, frankly I don't trust anyone to be able to think critically about what they read. I think we should outlaw disagreeable opinions. So much easier, I hate homework. But I love burning things! Let's start with books! My library has a copy of mein kampf in fact. Let's go burn it! That will take care of those damn nazis!
Well, that's just like your opinion man.
A New York Times reporter was responsible for the Iraq War by lying about weapons of mass destruction to sway congress. Jon Stewart interviewed the reporter and pretty much chewed the reporter out when trying to promote a book.
I see what the problem is.
Here, this should be more agreeable to you:
The New York Times is full of shit (Opinion)
👍
Ohhhh riiight yeah, so it's only their opinion articles the problem? That's your idea? Here buddy, this will help you a little bit, hopefully:
https://theintercept.com/2024/04/15/nyt-israel-gaza-genocide-palestine-coverage/
https://jacobin.com/2024/02/new-york-times-anti-palestinian-bias
And one last thing: "why Jews should be exterminated in concentration camps" can be an opinion piece as well. How exactly does the fact that it is an opinion make it excusable for any newspaper to post it? - and when it's done multiple times it stops being a coincidence. But then again, they are muslims and Arabs, it makes sense not to see the issue here, cause... racism.
These comments are so mind numbing. Have you seriously been sleeping through decades of war mongering media? Is "manufacturing consent" alien to you?
https://fair.org/home/20-years-later-nyt-still-cant-face-its-iraq-war-shame/
https://theintercept.com/2023/03/30/new-york-times-iraq-war-error/
Came to point out at least 3 of those are opinion pieces in the opinion column. I'd wager money the 4th is as well
Bret Stephens has been pissing me off since he started writing opinion pieces for the New York Times. He’s one of those conservatives who works incredibly hard to try to sound ‘reasonable,’ but if you pay attention to his language, he’s still just a warmongering piece of shit who pretends Israel can do no wrong. He has always believed that Israel is never the aggressor, despite the tens of thousands of innocent people they have indiscriminately murdered.
He has been on the wrong side of history for sooo many different conflicts and political issues, not just regarding Israel.
Yeah, he’s a never-Trumper, but that doesn’t make him a good person.
You can reliably find him justifying immoral and hateful uses of violence and destructive neoconservative policies. So I guess he fits right in at the New York Times.
NYT editorials have leaned far right for a long while now. They're FOX News with a longer, more bluechip reputation.
Do not use NYT as a reliable source. Do not trust NYT readers who do.
Bruh don't cite any opinion/op-ed as a source of fact. It's like right there at the fucking top that these 'articles' are someone's opinion.
Well, yeah, but I wouldn't trust NYT news as trustworty without confirmation from other sources. I'd say the integrity of the rag has been compromised, but I don't actually know if it ever was integral even in the Raymond and Jones days.
Bret Stephens is a bedbug.
Lemmygrad.ml are going to be so pissed that the capitalist pigs are copying their homework
I think it's fair to say they both copy the homework of each other, as they're all authoritarians who act like they're for the benefit of the people, so long as you endlessly agree with what the government says is always true and just.
