How MAGA broke the media

Journalism faces a right that has lost its bearings

A right that’s lost its bearings should have to face journalism.

But instead journalism turned around and called them daddy for the views.

Thank you for reading this concise history.

Article says

Clearly, you need to have conservative writers. But what kind?

Counterargument: No you don't. Conservative ideas are bankrupt, cruel, and/or foolish. We do not need to give them a platform.

Bill of Rights says otherwise. We could just do what PLENTY of other democratic societies do and ban hate speech but then you get those slippery slope arguments. Somehow we can make inciting a riot or inducing panic illegal but not the Great Replacement Theory.
- Bill of Rights says otherwise
  Nope. The right to free speech doesn't include the right to a platform to spew disinformation on.
  ban hate speech but then you get those slippery slope arguments
  Which are invalid, hence the Slippery slope fallacy . Hate speech is easy to identify and legislate against without banning legitimate speech. The people claiming otherwise tend to be people who routinely engage in hate speech and overly cautious neoliberals afraid of ever doing anything that could possibly be argued against in bad faith.
Conservative eyes are too close together like MTG, too stupid like Comer or too far apart like Candace. Do they got somebody with normal eyes who isn't a sex trafficker like Matt Gaetz?

MAGA didn't break the media

Media allowed themselves to be broken by MAGA

Absolutely! The media could have stopped the whole thing in its tracks by treating it with as much respect as it warrants, but instead they legitimatized a fascist movement by pretending that it had legitimate points argued in good faith.
The billionaire-owned media bears just as much of the responsibility as the GOP sycophants for enabling the madness of a malignant narcissist to become de facto mainstream even though their fascist ideology consists of nothing but ultra-authoritarian nationalism, scapegoating minorities and lies, lies lies! 🤬
Media chased money and maga led them in the right direction. Nothing was broken, it’s going exactly how media wanted.

First of all, vox, a "radical conservative" is an oxymoron.

You are looking for "reactionary conservative".

Second, the assertion that

Clearly, you need to have conservative writers. But what kind?

Is just plain wrong. Factual, objective reporting is nonpartisan. If you asked me who a prime time news anchor in 1980 would vote for, I would have no idea.

If you asked me who a prime time news anchor on 1980 would vote for, I would have no idea.
We are probably from different countries but I agree and interesting point.
- I miss Peter Jennings.
by virtue of the fact that they choose which stories to cover, they are slanting the conversation.
- Definitely. But the effort toward appearing objective was made, which in my experience is superior to Fox News, who makes all the editorial filters THEN projects a narrative until the ones it covers.

I would say both-sides-ism is the problem. It allows MAGA people to have a voice in the name of "fairness" and it was a problem before MAGA happened. It's been a problem for a very long time and has only gotten worse.

It isn't unfair to allow one "side" to speak lies while someone else is speaking the truth. In fact, it's the opposite of fair.

Wait, are you actually making the argument that only your side should be represented because it's the only side that doesn't lie? I mean, that is the very definition of blind partisanship.
- There is no "both sides" about true things.
  There is no "both sides" about climate change. The Earth is warming and humans are the cause.
  There's no "both sides" about vaccination. Vaccines help the immune system either prevent or reduce the severity of viral infections.
  There's no "both sides" about the 2020 election. Joe Biden won the election.
  And yet the media pretends all of those things have two sides.

Her eyes look like her parents shared parents.