You're viewing a single thread.
I think that will be increasingly impossible to enforce, as AI art gets increasingly better.
Also, if someone finds some cool art online how are they to know if AI was used or not?
For me it would not be about enforcing but about giving the option to disclaim it.
exactly 👍
If AI artists are so confident that they are equals, why are they trying so hard to hide it?
Because it gets a negative response? Regardless of whether they think it has a valid place as an art form, if they know it will get a negative response they probably won't want to share it.
As a result, suspicion falls on everyone and AI image uploaders are seen as dishonest.
There's an Among Us joke there that I just can't find.
We're not trying to hide it, we care if you think it's AI or not. We just want to make majestic art
'make majestetic art' art isn't just 'content'. It's supposed to have thought and emotion behind it. Come back to me when you have spent 3 hours slaving over a real piece, where every single stroke has a thought behind it.
I think if you're an art enthusiast, maybe, but for me I just go "oo pretty"
The amount of effort that goes into something has no bearing on its value, otherwise Leonardo's doodles are less valuable than your efforts, and that's clearly bollocks
Then why not label the method of production?
Why? Do you need a label saying "made with pencils"? The hate bubble is deflating and you lot are losing. Get on with it already
Ah, so you've never seen something described as "charcoal on parchment" or "oil paint on canvas" or "photograph, film" or the number of other ways artists use to specifically describe art and the medium used?
You want AI generated art to be respected? Declare like any other medium.
Also you shouldn't think someone is hating because they want a label for the object they are interacting with.
Of course I have. In a gallery. That's not the gotcha you think it is
Because I don't care enough to? You can label your stuff "made without AI" if it bothers you
Ah, enjoy getting more "AI is bullshit" type posts.
I already state what medium I use, because I'm not a petulant child about it.
as AI art gets increasingly better
I don't see it getting better nearly so much as I see it getting pervasive. When AI is one submission in ten and you've got a 90% flag rate, you can trim the instance of unflagged content to one submission in a hundred. But when AI is nine submissions in ten, half your feed is still AI-slop. When its ninety-nine submissions in a hundred, you're looking at nine AI images in ten even with a filter.
The AI doesn't need to get any better at evading the filter. It just needs to beat the filter by raw numbers.