You're viewing a single thread.
yeah, that ain't gonna happen
-
The article says that membership would apply only after the war.
-
That rule is not an official rule and does not exist in NATO's treaty. It is a guideline set by the Obama administration to appease Putin.
NATO membership is exactly the thing Ukraine needs right now, after Russia proved that military aid to Ukraine did not prevent them from invading.
-
Why not?
Literally against their rules. Countries are not eligible if they are fighting an active war.
Theoretically, the idea would be that the joining of NATO would be part of ending the war. NATO could allow it if they wanted to.
and literally wouldn't happen either, seeing how every member has to approve, including turkey and hungary.
Special military operation, the aggressor denies it is a war or invasion, but I'm not sure how that affects NATO enrollment.
I assume this is "the Trump plan" so he'll say agree to it or he takes the US and goes home.
Did you read the article?
Accession to NATO usually requires border disputes to be resolved. Last I knew Canada, the US and Turkey were also standing in the way.
Hungary as well. Not to downplay US and Canada bullshit, but Hungary and Turkey, being quasi autocracies themselves, have really been fucking up attempts to make countries safer from Russian aggression.
Wow shame on Canada!
Canada supports extending an invitation to Ukraine to join NATO and ultimately granting it full membership, Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly said in Montreal, according to Ukrinform.
Not sure why this guy said Canada is standing in the way of membership.
That rule is not an official rule and does not exist in NATO's treaty. It is a guideline set by the Obama administration to appease Putin.
Those countries need to realize that they need to let Ukraine into NATO if they want the war to end, and for Ukraine to not consider building nuclear weapons for their defense.