Man, that title. They grew everything in sand. Regolith is filled with concentrated salts, and there's no liquid water that we know of. At best, this experiment shows that if your inedible moss in a flower pot is briefly exposed to actual Martian conditions, it might survive when you bring it back inside.
He doesn't even need a lawyer. As long as he gets a jury trial he could plead his own case and get acquited. No one wants these things hovering over their property.
Most fossils happen when something gets covered by soil or sand or whatever before it's had a chance to decompose. Over eons, the organic material gradually transforms into stone, but it retain it's shape.
So, when they decorate the walls with shit, it’s acceptable. When I do it, they
put me in my straight jacket.
...throw me out of the Capital Building!
We have that in the states too but they show the same commercials in every commercial break. They are so repetitive, I can barely get through a single episode.
Fuck Bill Nye. Beakman's World is where it's at.
That is the least informative article I have read. We're all dumber for having read it.
Hmmm. Will they rule for the rich guys or the public at large? 🤔
Have the Army recall him to active duty and try him under the UCMJ.
She must have liked because after I thanked her she said it was her pleasure.
When are these guys going to come to their senses and bring in the Chick-fil-A line managers?
I think the Democratic Party should dump the donkey and make the eagle their animal mascot or whatever.
I would think consuming inactivated virus in pasteurized milk would give your body more opportunity to stumble upon a response to an active virus. I should add that I am a complete moron though.
Why stop at edible? Let's make them delicious.!
From the people that brought you Fake News, we now present.... Fake School.
My favorite of late was the congressman who said the eclipse was a result of our hedonistic ways. Surely the moon would move to a different orbit if we made trans illegal.
If you get them young enough, you can avoid that troublesome think for yourself phase.
I don't even understand what they're asking for here? Are they suggesting that the Supreme Court can overturn a state conviction? I didn't think that was allowed, but if any court is corrupt enough to do it I suppose it's this one.
