You'd think the bad publicity alone would be enough to destroy any chance of election. You'd think.
It does on the surface, but the problem is it quickly devolves into extreme utilitarianism. There are some other issues such as:
- How rich is rich enough for EA? Who decides?
- How much suffering is it acceptable to cause while getting rich to deliver EA?
- Is it better to deal with the problems we have now and in the immediate future, or avoid problems in millions of years that we may or may not accurately be able to predict?
- Can you even apply morality and ethics to people that do not exist?
- Who decides what has the most value?
- It's a cult.
The joke that keeps giving.
But no vaping ban?
The cynic in me says this is to test the water to see how pliable we are. What else will follow if we accept this, I wonder?
Exactly. We need to wipe them out at the next election.
It'll probably be against the law soon at the rate we're going.
Haha all good :D
I know, I was just curious how many steps it would take before they were honest about their own bigotry.
Of course they don't have the balls to be, so instead stay vague and deflect.
So no examples to back up your claim. Ok.
Do you have an example?
Spend that oil money trying not to look like backwards cunts while you still can, I suppose.
So you mean racism.
Can you define woke?
Drunk typo takes an unexpected twist!
The food news is this useless cunt will die one day.
Yes, let's retreat to the most hostile environment imaginable and live under the whim of sociopathic billionaires.
That seems like a good alternative to, I don't know, actually not destroying the environment we've perfectly evolved to live in.
On a side note, World 3 seems to be depressingly accurate.