Yeah, they're all the same. Musk, Trump, crypto, religion, AI - they all offer a simple, easy solution to all problems. It's false hope, but it's reassuring and we're all susceptible to it given the chaos of existence.

Reality is complicated, politics is complicated, running countries is complicated, and no one has all the answers. We have to work on those together. No one person is going to solve all the problems we have, and these cunts absolutely don't give a fuck about you or me or the 'working man'.

It works because it's such an easy sell and it's easy to fall for it. I have before too. But being good at battering people and choking them out does not by default translate into being able to run a country (maybe thousands of years ago hah).

Thats the other aspect to these things. We tend to mistakenly assume that because a person is good at one thing, they're automatically going to be good at everything. People like Musk and McGregor are also very good at selling this, because they're generally talking to people who also have a limited understanding of the topic.

I honestly think if we taught local civics and critical thinking on a global scale you'd massively reduce this kind of problem, but who knows.

Ah, makes sense. I wonder how long he can slither around like this until it finally bites him hard.

Well, he certainly would be whether he realised it or not - if by that you mean easily manipulated by outside interests (like musk and god knows who else)

Looked him up. Agree 👍

Jesus could he be more vague and incoherent?

The people behind that startup are in tears strangling each other wishing they thought of this.

Interestingly, it seems the last government were sitting on a massive prison overcrowding crisis, and there is now talk of sending prisoners to Estonian prisons to ease it.

To be honest, I'd imagine that'd be an even stronger deterrent for these pissbags. I can't imagine an Estonian prison being very accommodating!

Just waiting for the token drop 😂

Thanks for proving my point by responding with the classic go to 'rebuttal' when anyone challenges crypto: "you don't understand the tech!"

Cool. Let's save both of our time then. All the best.

There are lots of arguments against crypto, but the main one is that it is inferior to the current system in every conceivable way.

-It's slower -It's harder to use -It's full of scams -It's backed by nothing -There is no consumer protection -It amplifies the existing problems of the financial system instead of solving them (money laundering/scams/financial inequality) -It's dominated by the same rich cunts you're trying to escape, but they're even worse in crypto -All networks generally need L2s because they're so shit and slow

Those are just some off the top of my head.

Additionally, it's been around for a long time now. Everyone in crypto is so involved in solving the problems that are unique to crypto and Blockchain that they've missed the fact that no one gives a shit because it literally offers nothing we don't already have that works better.

The only reason anyone has ever cared about crypto is because it potentially offered a way to get rich quickly and 'easily' and get out of the grind.

It's a casino. That's fine, you might make money. But that's all it is.

I'm not saying the current system is ideal, or even good, but crypto is nothing like a viable alternative.

I'm all for decentralisation, but you do realise that all systems end up centralising to some extent over time because it's just more efficient, right? Maybe we can find a good balance and make sure accountability actually means something in our systems, whatever industry they're in, but the answer isn't crypto from what I've seen.

Interesting you talk about gatekeeping information when you're literally parroting crypto echo chamber rhetoric because if you dare suggest anything other than crypto is the future you will instantly get shut down. It's a cult, basically.

They're going to have a meltdown when they realise they're committing genocide on a cellular and microbial level every second they exist.

How the fuck do you 'swap' consciousness into something that doesn't have it?

Can you 'abuse' a brick, or a search engine, or a toaster?

Consciousness has only ever been observed in brains.

Chat GPT is not a fucking brain. It's not even close.

I think the government or the Labour party updated their definition of what anti Semitic meant to include any criticism of the Israeli government a few years ago, which also says a lot.

I think what we can do Nick, is read a bit about how modern 'AI', works, so we understand it isn't capable of ever having anything approaching consciousness in its current state, and not fucking worry about it.

Kind of like how we don't worry about people's race unless your skull is full of pig shit instead of functional neurons.

(On a side note Alex O'Conner is getting more and more disappointing in his quest for clicks.)

I guess that'd be standard for such a big brained philosopher though, so no need to point it out. Right?

This is what's hilarious about that 'logic'. If you think god made everything and is omnipotent, then he also made everything you get upset about.

This guy is laughabley brain dead, as was the post he promoted.

I disagree. The fediverse just proves you can have successful decentralisation without any whiff of blockchain. You call them legacy systems, but they are in fact still current systems aren't they.. we're still using them.

Sharing your opinion is not the same as sharing your art.

I agree that monetisation as a standard probably isn't ideal, but I think you're fooling yourself if you think a lot of the artists and musicians here aren't posting with some intent to drive you to their monetised content. Social media is a great place for artists to promote their work in general.

I thought the whole point of the fedi was to encourage open social media. If you don't want to see artists or monetised content, you can block those creators or instances. The fedi isn't subject to your preferences or mine, after all. I'm sorry, but I don't think you get to decide what does and doesn't happen here.

The thing is, monetisation wouldn't even work the same way here because there is no algorithm, so it's not like you'd get (as) many people trying to create rage bait to game the algorithm.

Your initial post came across as if you begrudge any creators or artists making any money from what they post here. If I misinterpreted your position then my bad, and I don't want enshitification either (although given the decentralised framework of the fedi, I'm not sure how that could even happen in the traditional sense).

100% agree. This attitude actually ends up devaluing art and entertainment because it basically boils down the to the idea that "it's not a real job."

Came here to ask the same question.