Wow, I’ve been saying for years that this extension is shady as fuck. Nice to see that it’s getting some attention.
I didn’t expect it to steal affiliate cookies, but that they let you control which codes it “finds” isn’t even a secret, and I thought people know this. But every time I mentioned this on Reddit I was downvoted and called a liar.
They have a CLI app though which you can hook up to dmenu or rofi or whatever to get global shortcuts.
https://github.com/firecat53/bitwarden-menu
Their desktop app is a bit shit anyway. I just use the CLI and the Firefox extension and it’s working solid.
I use Posteo for mail and calendar now (they’re not encrypted between users like Proton but you can just hook it up to any mail client and PGP your shit) .Mail is IMAPS, calendar is CalDAV, contacts are CardDAV, etc. Depending on where you fall on the security-convenience sliding scale, that might be an option. I’ve decided that I care more about portability and standards than super-thick encryption which made me choose them over Tuta, because Tuta offers no way to access the mail over IMAP whatsoever, not even an optional bridge like Proton, and that was a total dealbreaker for me. Posteo also claim they’re 100% green energy which is a nice bonus.
For drive I use Filen.io now. They’re relatively new so I can’t make any assumptions about how long they’ll be around but the price is fair and they offer lifetime payments too. Also their Linux client is pretty solid and doesn’t fucking eat my RAM for breakfast. They’re also in the process of adding support for rclone as per a GitHub issue I’m following.
VPN I pretty much don’t use because I’ve never felt I needed it, so no recommendations there from me.
I’m a senior software engineer
Nice, me too, and whenever some tech-brained C-suite bozo tries to mansplain to me why LLMs will make me more efficient, I smile, nod politely, and move on, because at this point I don't think I can make the case that pasting AI slop into prod is objectively a worse idea than pasting Stack Overflow answers into prod.
At the end of the day, if I want to insert a snippet (which I don't have to double-check, mind you), auto-format my code, or organize my imports, which are all things I might use ChatGPT for if I didn't mind all the other baggage that comes along with it, Emacs (or Vim, if you swing that way) does this just fine and has done so for over 20 years.
I empirically work quicker with it than without and the engineers I know who are still avoiding it work noticeably slower.
If LOC/min or a similar metric is used to measure efficiency at your company, I am genuinely sorry.
Let's be real here: when people hear the word AI or LLM they don't think of any of the applications of ML that you might slap the label "potentially useful" on (notwithstanding the fact that many of them also are in a all-that-glitters-is-not-gold--kinda situation). The first thing that comes to mind for almost everyone is shitty autoplag like ChatGPT which is also what the author explicitly mentions.
That's gotta be one of my favorite Zitron piece to date. Ed managed to articulate some points which have been floating around in my mind for a while which I did not have the words to explain. Especially how using any form of out-of-the-box computer these days is just a completely user-hostile pile of steaming horseshit, and why I am anal-retentive about what software gets installed on my devices and how exactly my window manager has to work, &c.
I mean, it's probably because I'm an obsessive nerd, but the fact that it makes me feel in control when I can rip shit of the source code that bugs me (or put shit in that I miss) is a major factor, too.
Jfc, when I saw the headline I thought this would be a case of the city being too cheap to hire an actual artist and instead use autoplag, but no. And the guy they commissioned isn't even some tech-brain LARP'ing as an artist, he has 20+ years of experience and a pretty huge portfolio, which somehow makes this worse on so many levels.
[...] placed in environments that incentivize scheming.
If this turns out to be another case of "research" where they told the model exactly what to do beforehand and then go all surprised Pikachu when it does, I'm gonna be shocked ...
... because it's been a while since they've tried that.
Yay, day 3 with Regexp magic.
Day 3
open(FH, '<', $ARGV[0]) or die $!;
my $sum = 0;
my $sum2 = 0;
my $enabled = 1;
while (<FH>) {
while ($_ =~ /(?:mul\((\d{1,3}),(\d{1,3})\)|(do)\(\)|(don\'t)\(\))/g) {
$enabled = 1 if $3;
$enabled = 0 if $4;
$sum += $1 * $2 if $1 && $2;
$sum2 += $1 * $2 if $enabled && $1 && $2;
}
}
close(FH);
print "Part 1: $sum\n";
print "Part 2: $sum2\n";
That conversation reads like from a variation of Mafia/Werewolf where you have to figure out who in your circle of rationalists is secretly e/acc and wants to build the torment nexus.
1 day old and over 1000 kudos. Holy shit.
No beta we die like Brian Thompson.
Day 2, Part 1
use strict;
use List::Util qw( min max );
open(FH, '<', $ARGV[0]) or die $!;
my @lines;
while (<FH>) {
my @report = split /\s/, $_;
push @lines, \@report;
}
close FH;
sub in_range {
my $diff = max($_[0], $_[1]) - min($_[0], $_[1]);
return $diff >= 1 && $diff <= 3;
}
sub is_safe {
my $prev = @$_[0];
my $dir = 0;
for (my $i = 1; $i < scalar @$_; ++$i) {
my $el = @$_[$i];
if ($el > $prev) {
return 0 unless $dir >= 0;
$dir = 1;
} elsif ($el < $prev) {
return 0 unless $dir <= 0;
$dir = -1;
}
return 0 unless in_range $prev, $el;
$prev = $el;
}
return 1;
}
sub part1 {
my $safe_reports = 0;
foreach (@_) {
$safe_reports++ if is_safe @$_;
}
return $safe_reports;
}
print 'Part 1: ', part1(@lines), "\n";
My part 2 solution didn't work with the real input but worked with all the test cases I threw at it, so I couldn't figure out what was wrong with it and I'm too lazy to debug any more right now.
Advent of Code is one of these things I wanna do every year and then I end up in fucking end-of-the-year crunch time every December and work for 10-12 hours and really don't wanna code after work anymore.
But hey, here's a quick solution for day 1. Let's see how far I make it.
Day 1
use strict;
use List::Util qw( min max );
open(FH, '<', $ARGV[0]) or die $!;
my @left;
my @right;
while (<FH>) {
my @nums = split /\s+/, $_;
push(@left, $nums[0]);
push(@right, $nums[1]);
}
@left = sort { $b <=> $a } @left;
@right = sort { $b <=> $a } @right;
my $dist = 0;
my $sim = 0;
my $i = 0;
foreach my $lnum (@left) {
$sim += $lnum * grep { $_ == $lnum } @right;
my $rnum = $right[$i++];
$dist += max($lnum, $rnum) - min($lnum, $rnum);
}
print 'Part 1: ', $dist, "\n";
print 'Part 2: ', $sim, "\n";
close(FH);
Promptfondlers too lazy to even fondle prompts anymore. I’m sure this is the prime target demographic for Elon’s brain chips.
I'd say lol but I'm like 72% sure this is straight out of the video game industry's playbook and very much intentional to create hype because everyone has forgotten this shit even exists.
Also, I'm still waiting for just one use case for video-generating autoplag that is, even in theory, not either morally reprehensible or outright criminal.
So there's apparently a memecoin site with the not-at-all suspicious name pump.fun and Coffeezilla made a video about it on his second channel.
Also: Epilepsy warning for that site. It's full of flashing colors and moving elements like late 90s Geocities.
I have no idea what the fuck is even going on there, but apparently people threaten to kill themselves or their animals if you don't invest in their shitcoin there, or run actual cockfights where they murder the chickens live on stream if the line doesn't go up.
This is fucked even without the hallucinating Clippy in the backend.
If your desktop is idle for more than 30-60 seconds (no "meaningful" mouse & keyboard movement), you get a red flag
People getting flogged flagged for being lazy for a few seconds reminds me of something …
That was a great read.
The point of all of this is to say: the tech utopia fantasy is truly dead to me. The image of the cool, hippie, leftist Silicon Valley tech is wrong.
I feel this in my soul, because I was that leftist hippie who got into tech because he believed all this shit and getting disillusioned over time was just fucking painful and made me hate those goons with a passion.
The straw I have left is that I’m not alone and that more people realize this and we make our own communities again that don’t suck. There’s still a long way to go, and Fedi has its own problems, especially when it comes to kick out the racists, sexists, and other bigots, but I try to stay positive that we’ll get there. At least to a degree.
(I mean, we have Awful and it’s an example that you can keep the bar nazi-free if you want to.)
Seems like they've actually done this now. There's a preface note now.
This topic was chosen based on the technical merit of the project before we were aware of its author's political views and controversies. Our coverage of technical projects is never an endorsement of the developers' political views. The moderation of comments here is not meant to defend, or defame, anybody, but is in keeping with our longstanding policy against personal attacks. We could certainly have handled both topic selection and moderation better, and will endeavor to do so going forward.
Which is better than nothing, I guess, but still feels like a cheap cop-out.
Side-note: I can actually believe that they didn't know about Justine being a fucking nazi when publishing this, because I remember stumbling across some of her projects and actually being impressed by it, and then I found out what an absolute rabbit hole of weird shit this person is. So I kinda get seeing the portable executables project, thinking, wow, this is actually neat, and running with it.
Not that this is an excuse, because when you write articles for a website that should come with a bit of research about the people and topic you choose to cover and you have a bit more responsibility than someone who's just browsing around, but what do I know.
On Toxic Productivity
Ever since the beginning of the AI slopnami, but more specifically since the public diaspora about the technology began and a large number of people --- or dare I say the majority? --- started to hate the plagiarism machine that Sam Altman and his friends unleashed upon the world, I wondered who exactly are the people that violently defend this technology?
Yes, on the one hand you have big corporations. That\'s the obvious one. Of course OpenAI and Nvidia are happy with how things are going, because they either make money from it or hope they can milk the venture capitalists even further before they finally exit-scam before the burst of the bubble. My question, however, is, who are the normal people who fanboy over the latest iteration of ChatGPT or Midjourney or whatever iteration of spicy auto-completion tickles their fancy at the moment. Who, in a time where the public opinion on not just Artificial \"Intelligence\" but the tech sector as a whole is at an all-time low with artists and creatives hating it with every fiber of their beings, decides to die on the hill that endless repetitive plagiarized slop is the future that\'s not just inevitable but desirable?
You will hear again and again that the AI crowd is just the reboot of the crypto bros from a few years ago. Those people who spent unreasonable amounts of moneys on links to bad monkey JPGEs hosted on the Ethereum blockchain[^1], and that is probably true. But if we draw the Venn diagram here, then there is a third crowd that has a surprisingly large overlap with the other two. Maybe more so with AI than with crypto, but ultimately with both, and that is the infamous sphere of productivity addicts.
Now, there is story to tell about the role of productivity in the age of hustle culture and whether it\'s even something we should view in positive light in the first place, but that\'s not what I am trying to do here. I think everyone must decide for themselves whether the concept of productivity as it is presented by people on YouTube and the internet in general is something they like, dislike, or outright hate, and I believe that a lot of creators have good intention when they make videos about their study techniques and note-taking approaches. I use and have used tools like Roam Research[^2] myself, and when I was a student, I had my own ways of organizing notes and finding them again. Even for casual writing I use some of these tools, for example to create a personal wiki of characters for stories, and so on. And that\'s fine.
No, the productivity sphere on YouTube in particular, but probably also on other social media platforms I am less familiar with, has a dark side, one which I like to call Toxic Productivity. The difference between toxic productivity people and the normal creators is that the toxic crowd takes it to such extremes that not only everything in their lives has to be maximally productive, but they also --- and that\'s where the toxic part comes in --- look down on people who are less productive than them (however they decide to measure that).
Productivity YouTube isn\'t new. The trend has been ongoing for over a decade at this point and has evolved from students giving study tips to people making full-blown businesses out of it, and the latter is where the problem lies.
A few of you probably saw some parallels with another group of people: podcast bros. In no medium is toxic productivity as prominent as in the podcast sphere, I\'d say. Podcasts about getting rich quick, opening a successful business, or creating your own successful brand are a dime a dozen. The parallel between these people and AI grifters isn\'t lost on people, with TSMC executive calling Altman a \"podcasting bro\"[^3] when he came in begging for \$7 trillion \[sic\] to further finance his ocean-boiling money sink.
If I asked you to name one creator who personifies what I have described as toxic productivity up until this point, I am sure I would hear many different names. For me, the poster child of toxic productivity is however Ali Abdaal[^4].
Productivity on 3.5x Speed
Depending on how terminally online you are on YouTube, you might have never heard that name, and I would not blame you. In a world of people like Andrew Tate, who arguably caters to the same people, namely those striving towards self-improvement, who want to become rich and successful, and who are gullible enough to dump money on everyone who tells them they came solve their problem with a snap of their fingers, Abdaal isn\'t a big fish at first glance. All things considered, Tate is more toxic than most of the others in the sphere combined, and probably more dangerous too, but he is also more obviously a scam. Tate\'s audience is very clearly not the average college student but lonely young men who hate women and the world, and I don\'t want to get into that here. Abdaal, on the other hand, can be considered the polar opposite of that. His book, aptly names \"Feel Good Productivity\", makes that clear. He\'s not here to sell you a toxic worldview like Tate. He doesn\'t want to make you hate women and society. No, he\'s a nice person and friendly and inclusive.
But let\'s back up for a moment: who exactly is Ali Abdaal?
On his website, he writes:
> Hey, I\'m Ali Abdaal. I\'m an ex-doctor turned YouTuber, Podcaster, > entrepreneur, and author (and I dabble with the occasional investment > too).
Abdaal started out as one of the aforementioned college YouTubers who shared study tips on the platform. He was an aspiring doctor attending Cambridge University teaching things like spaced repetition[^5] in his videos, a largely uncontroversial learning technique. And if he had stayed with that type of content, I would not even be mentioning him in this article, but as is evident from his introductory sentence on the website, that\'s not how it went. He\'s an \"ex-doctor turned YouTuber\", and on top of that, an \"entrepreneur\" (I will conveniently ignore the part about \"occasional investment\" here, but we\'ll get back to that).
The career of Abdaal is a great example of the pipeline form harmless productivity tips into the realm of toxic productivity, because as he steered from study tips towards helping you maximizing your productivity every waking moment of your life, his videos became different too.
One noteworthy thing about it is that Abdaal was one of the first who did this, so not the whole cult of toxic productivity grew alongside him. Whether or not he\'s directly responsible or at least largely influential isn\'t someting I can answer here, but it\'s at least something to keep in mind.
The most infamous (and since removed) example of this is \"How To Watch TV Productively\". You might have furrowed your eyebrows at that title and rightfully so. I think even Abdaal himself must have noticed that he went a little too far with that one since he took it down or set it to private a while later, but there is still a Reddit thread discussing it[^6] online as well as a video from creator Fr0nzP.[^7] which talks about many of the same point I am in this text that has clips of it.
> Watching anime and watching TV in general feels to me like kind of a > waste of time. And because I worship the ultra-productivity and the > only thing I care about is productivity, everything in my life has to > be productive, like, you know, listening to audio books at 3.5x speed, > \[...\]
This provides a perfect example of Abdaal\'s mindset. He\'s not concerned about studying anymore, or about helping you study, he\'s gone down the path of \"ultra-productivity\". Before I continue with the TV video, let me show you another one if his: \"How I Type REALLY Fast (156 Words per Minute)\"[^8], and this one is still up and you can enjoy it for yourself. He opens the video up claiming that \"having a ridiculously fast typing speed is one of \[his\] superpowers in life\" (0:10) and that \"anyone can become at least twice as productive if \[they\] just increase\[d\] \[their\] typing speed\" (0:18).
Now, unless you\'re working as a court reporter (in which case you are probably using stenography anyway) or writing stream-of-consciousness, I argue that this statement is false, because typing faster than you think is probably not the productivity boost that Abdaal thinks it is, but even if you accept his words as true, it demonstrates again his attitude towards life. He even states that things like \"going on websites\" and \"sending messages to friends, \[and\] all of that stuff becomes quicker therefore you\'ll become more productive\" (1:45).
I think you can see a pattern here. Abdaal believes that cramming more things into every day is the key aspect of productivity. It\'s probably already questionable whether that\'s true for studying (because writing more notes in less time doesn\'t mean you understand the concepts, so shouldn\'t you study smarter and not faster?), but applying that same approach to your hobbies is just completely insane --- which brings us back to the TV video.
So, how does Abdaal watch anime and TV productively you might ask? Well, the fact that his listens to audio books on 3.5x speed should give you an idea.
> \[...\] normally what I do is, I\'ll just > speed-speed-speed-speed-speed-speed-speed up until it gets to an > interesting point, and I\'ll speed it as fast as I can so I can still > keep up with it.
And because he obviously can\'t hear what\'s being said when watching at 3.5x speed anymore, he\'s speed-reading subtitles.
I can\'t be the only one wondering whether he gets any enjoyment out of consuming media this way, can I? Especially because he applies this advice not to lectures of tutorial material or other videos for which this might work, but films and series that have been created to be watched as a recreational activity. How productivity-brained must you be to judge media in a way like this, and what does that even mean? What even is an \"interesting point\" for someone with a view like that? We don\'t have to guess, because Abdaal tells us himself that the parts he doesn\'t have to watch at normal speed are \"when it gets to \[...\] building character \[...\] kind-of stuff\".
Yes, you read that right: Abdaal thinks that character building in a work of fiction is the stuff you can speed through because it\'s not interesting or not important. Which makes me wonder why he\'s even watching any of that to begin with. Sure, there are people who don\'t enjoy fiction, and who rather spend their time differently, and that\'s fine, but this reeks of someone who feels guilty for wanting to watch anime or TV, and who needs to find a way to justify doing so by fitting it into their distorted world view in which everything has to serve a productive purpose. And even more so, it shows that Abdaal does not view recreation or relaxation as a productive activity in the first place. He thinks that if you take time out of your day to do something you enjoy that does not directly lead to some sort of tangible gain, monetary or otherwise, it is not worth doing and you\'re lazy.
That is the definition of toxic productivity.
Of course, this also completely invalidates the work of people who make the shows he skips through (and probably do so for a living). Fr0nzP. puts it best in his video.
> Actually thinking that any artistic decision such as pauses, music, or > nuances in facial expressions can be disregarded as long as you pick > up the plot via subtitles is utterly stupid. (2:34--2:47)
What is Art? (Baby don\'t hurt me...)
If that\'s not enough to show you how Abdaal completely disregards art because it doesn\'t fit with his his worship of \"ultra-productivity\", Fr0nzP. cites another one of his videos, \"How I Read 100 Books a Year - 8 Tips of Reading More\"[^9], in which he shits on classic literature and dismisses literature students as examples of people he looks down on between the lines. He further exemplifies this in his later video \"How to \'Read\' 1000 Books a Year\" (let that title sink in for a moment). In that video, he does admittedly make a good point that it\'s find to not finish a book if you don\'t enjoy it and that you should not feel pressured by society or your peers to read something you don\'t want to really read. The rest of it, however, is a weird conglomeration of product placement (he namedrops brands left and right, mentioning how they\'re not sponsoring the video but are super amazing and life-changing) as well as advocating speed-reading and skimming --- again, something that does not work well with fiction, as some of the comments underneath the video point out.
Also, if you look for a drinking game that will absolutely wreck you: take a shot every time he mentions Amazon or the Kindle in that video.
So, what books does he read and recommend then? Take a wild guess.
No, seriously, before you read on, think about the contents of this article, which is the overlap between the toxic productivity sphere and AI bros, and just try to guess one book he recommends.
Ready?
In titled \"The Best Book I\'ve Ever Read about Morality\"[^10] he sings the praise of \"What We Owe The Future\" by William MacAskill, but the video is basically a twelve-minute mental exercise in jerking off to Effective Altruism, because of course it is. We learn that Abdaal is not only a card-carrying member of EA but also donates 10% of his yearly income to it (or to charities which fit their criteria for being worthwhile).
There\'s also a shout-out to MacAskill on his Twitter, (fittingly after a long series of posts where he stealth-promotes ChatGPT and how it can boost your productivity), complete with a drive-by mention of AI x-risk.
> To learn more about the risks of AI and other long-term risks to > humanity, check out moral philosopher \@willmacaskill's excellent book > What We Owe the Future. Or alternatively, check out my brief summary > of the book on my YouTube channel[^11]
In another video, \"8 Lessons I Learned From Elon Musk\"[^12] Abdaal fawns over Elon and how successful he is. One of the lessons in there is ironically that \"reading is the best thing ever\", mentioning how Elon\'s idea of founding SpaceX without being an engineer or having a clue about rocket science is that he read about it. I find it quite condescending, though, to make a claim like that but put an asterisk at the end that means, but only if you read non-fiction, because otherwise you\'re wasting your time.
Part-Time Hustle Academy
We could leave Ali Abdaal here and focus on someone else, but I promised you above that we would return to his investment tips. Much like with his productivity-related content, he started out harmless and uncontroversial by just giving basic tips about dipping your toes into investment by checking out ETFs and not being afraid of the stock market. But also as with his other videos, his focus shifted and became stranger.
Making money is the second biggest topic on his channel, and yes, that is of course part of toxic productivity as we have established above, because everything needs to have a tangible benefit and what benefit is more tangible than actually making bank. So, he has videos about generating income streams and making more money than you peers and, of course, Bitcoin![^13] In his defense, he doesn\'t appear to be a crypto bro at least, and he does list the controversies around Bitcoin in this video and makes some wishy-washy takes about how everyone must decide for themselves whether they want to invest in it.
But what\'s the end-goal of all that? What if you want to be as productive as Abdaal himself? Well, good news, there\'s a solution for you and it\'s called the \"Part-Time YouTuber Academy\"[^14].
> We've condensed 7+ years of YouTube experience into programmes > designed to help you on your YouTube journey. > > We learned lessons the hard way, so you don't have to...
This is basically Abdaal\'s version of every podcasting bro\'s \"If you want to be successful, you need to become like me!\" course, and we\'ve seen plenty of those in the last decade. So how much does this thing cost, you might ask? Well, at the time of writing the fee for Abdaal\'s class is \$995. And if that\'s too expensive for you and you don\'t really want to make YouTube videos, he also has offers on platforms like Skillshare, like the \"Productivity Masterclass\", the \"Notion Masterclass\", \"Triple Your Typing Speed\" (here we go again), or \"How To Cook Productively\" (no, I\'m not joking).[^15]
Well, I don\'t have a thousand bucks to waste but lucky for us there are people who did and reviewed the course wo we can take a look at what it\'s actually like. YouTuber TyFrom99 in his video \"Creator Courses: Selling Dreams as Products\"[^16] talks about the Part-Time YouTuber Academy. He also summarizes Abdaal\'s whole brand in a very concise way.
> Ali is a YouTuber that has basically popularized what I like to call > the \"productivity cult\". Almost every channel you see centered > around the topic of productivity is influenced directly by Ali > \[...\]. It\'s clear he carved the genre out almost single-handedly. > (14:35)
He also mentions that the productivity sphere is a toxic space and that it\'s basically a \"nerdified and systematized \[version of\] the hustle culture that people like Andrew Tate promote\" (14:57). Oh gee, maybe his content isn\'t that different from the likes of Andrew Tate but only flavored in a different way?
Tate sells you dreams. He sells you success. He sells you being like him, which is rich (probably) and handsome (uhh, about that...) and successful with women (wait a moment!), and the only thing you need to do for that is fork over some of your cash and subscribe to his classes. He calls his grift \"Hustler\'s University\" and apparently makes millions from it.[^17] Sounds familiar?
Unlike Tate, however, Abdaal is upfront about that nothing he teaches in his course can\'t be found out by just searching the internet, so at least he\'s honest. He\'s selling you curated and condensed information that you would otherwise have to dig up yourself, or, in other words, he sells you time which you can use more productively. \"We learned lessons the hard way, so you don\'t have to\" indeed.
Fr0nzP., who also delves into the PTYA in his video[^18] is less generous and says that \"Ali makes over \$130k each month, with 5--10 hours of effort each week\", and argues \"that giving the impression of productivity as a recipe of arriving at those numbers is dishonest and even borders on fraud\" (12:33--12:47). Looking at some of the channels, he comes to the same conclusion as TyFrom99: namely, that most of the channels who took the class didn\'t see much success from it. Moreover, all the engagement these channels get seems to be from other people who took the class. Abdaal\'s quantity-over-quality approach (don\'t forget that in his opinion productivity just means doing more in less time) shows here, too.
Final Thoughts
So what\'s the takeaway of all of his? In the beginning I promised to make a point about people who are into AI and who defend this technology despite its obvious problems. It\'s exactly the people who are swooned by the weird takes of Ali Abdaal, who define being productive as cramming as much activity into their day as humanly possible, who don\'t give a rat\'s ass about art and don\'t assign value to it, and who don\'t view time spent recreationally as worth their while who feel drawn to the promises of Altman too. Yes, he is a podcasting bro indeed, because behind all his thinly-veiled technofascist TESCREAL talk he is selling you productivity too. ChatGPT can work for you, it can save you time, it can do the tasks you don\'t want to do!
What are these tasks, though? In the Culture Series by Iain M. Banks[^19], one of the great science-fiction series of the modern time that deals with AI as a major cultural factor, and that\'s not understood by any AI bro who\'s read it, boring menial tasks are automated so that humanity, under the leadership of the benign AIs, can spend it\'s time engaging in art and things they enjoy. Altman\'s future has nothing of that, because none of it is of value to him. Instead, art is automated to people can work more and make more money.
It\'s no wonder that big companies like Adobe subscribe to this ideology and try to force it upon their customers[^20], because they are invested in Altman\'s bubble, but who are the small people who do? The self-proclaimed \"AI artists\" who shout that AI democratizes art and finally makes it accessible to the masses (never mind that there\'s more art tutorials on YouTube than productivity shit and that there are few skills who need as little investment as art, because you can get started with a pencil you steal from IKEA and the back of your last unpaid electricity bill if you really want)?
It seems counterproductive to peddle AI as a small creator at this point when it seems as if more and more consumers are turned off by products that use it[^21], but that isn\'t what these people see. For them, it\'s like Ali Abdaal\'s advice that you first need to vomit out 100 videos on YouTube and then can start worrying about quality. These first 100 videos, or I guess artworks in this case, would\'ve been part of your training at any point in time prior to 2022, but now the automatic plagiarizer can make them for you in an hour, and you can put them on your portfolio and call yourself an artist. It doesn\'t even matter that you don\'t get any experience or skill from that because you are productive. Not a single artist in human history could product that many works in that short amount of time, just as no one could watch as much anime before the invention of the fast-forward button.
\"Feel Good Productivity\" indeed, because doesn\'t it feel good to have a portfolio that keeps filling itself? To have a tool that promises to make writer\'s block go poof? Because that, everyone, must be the future of productivity!
Or, maybe not, because normal people (you know, those who don\'t wanna watch their shows on 3.5x speed but actually take time and enjoy them, or who don\'t speed-read novels, and who don\'t measure the values of their lives on how much side-hustling they can do during their lunch break at work) do not seem to view the increased workload as more productive but instead find it does quite the opposite.[^22]
> Despite 96% of C-suite executives expecting AI to boost productivity, > the study reveals that, 77% of employees using AI say it has added to > their workload and created challenges in achieving the expected > productivity gains. Not only is AI increasing the workloads of > full-time employees, it's hampering productivity and contributing to > employee burnout.
Well, we can certainly see where the toxic productivity crowd sees themselves then, can\'t we?
Footnotes
[^1]: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bored_Ape>
[^2]: <https://roamresearch.com/>
[^3]: <https://www.techspot.com/news/104907-openai-sam-altman-dismissed-podcasting-bro-tsmc-over.html>
[^4]: <https://aliabdaal.com/>
[^5]: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaced_repetition>
[^6]: <https://old.reddit.com/r/productivity/comments/i2pcva/ali_abdaal_how_i_watch_tv_productively/>
[^7]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z8M7oxjvdw>
[^8]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ArVtCQqQRE>
[^9]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tKuviI68Ss>
[^10]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zi5gD9Mh29A>
[^11]: <https://xcancel.com/AliAbdaal/status/1583203067927101440>
[^12]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlvxviP-xNg>
[^13]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXkiAfjFtgU>
[^14]: <https://ptya.com/>
[^15]: <https://www.skillshare.com/en/user/aliabdaal>
[^16]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmixszMNFgM>
[^17]: <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66581218>
[^18]: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z8M7oxjvdw>
[^19]: <https://www.iain-banks.net/landing-page/iain-banks/iain-banks-books/>
[^20]: <https://80.lv/articles/adobe-says-artists-should-embrace-ai-if-they-want-to-be-successful/>
[^21]: <https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-consumers-turned-off-products-ai>
[^22]: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2024/07/23/employees-report-ai-increased-workload/>
Note: In my last newsletter, I said that my next post would be the second part of my Facebook autopsy. Don’t worry, that’s still coming, but given the recent drama between Sam Altman, OpenAI, and Scarlett Johansson, I felt the need to write something. Don’t worry, I
Wake up honey, new Zitron just dropped.
Looks like Sammy boy has a crush on Scarlett Johansson and wanted to model his sexy chatbot after her role in the movie Her. The damage control is actually hilarious.
> Altman subsequently claimed that the actress for Sky was cast before the company reached out to Johansson.
“Yeah, I don’t want to go out with you anyway. Also, I already have a girlfriend but she goes to a different school, so you wouldn’t know her. And no, I won’t tell you who it is!”
I mean, we all knew that OpenAI is a fucking clown show of a company run by wannabe nerd frat boys with way too much money, but I didn’t think we’d get high school level relationship drama this season.
This AI hype cycle has dramatically distorted society's views of what's possible with image upscalers.
It was honestly only a matter of time before someone thought we could try that thing where they identify a license plate from a reflection in some dude’s pupil for realsies.
> Puloka’s lawyers reportedly used an “expert” in creative video production who’d never worked on a criminal case before to “enhance” the video. The AI tool this unnamed expert used was developed by Texas-based Topaz Labs, which is available to anyone with an internet connection.
You wouldn’t know this expert though. He goes to a different school.
> Large language models like ChatGPT have convinced otherwise intelligent people that these chatbots are capable of complex reasoning when that’s simply not what’s happening under the hood.
And at least the judge here had more than five brain cells and shut that circus down. Let’s hope this sets a precedent.
SXSW audiences all day booed a festival video (played Tuesday in front of screenings) featuring tech pundits touting their enthusiasm for AI.
It seems like in the proceeds of building their alleged Star Trek utopia with robots and holodecks, tech bros have discovered that they’d rather be the Borg than Starfleet and have begun shilling the pros of getting yourself assimilated at SXSW of all places.
> “I actually think that AI fundamentally makes us more human.”
I think it makes us more brain damaged, with this guy being exhibit A, but I guess you could argue that’s a fundamental human property (unless you count hallucinating LLMs).
> Those folks sure seem bullish on artificial intelligence, and the audiences at the Paramount — many of whom are likely writers and actors who just spent much of 2023 on the picket line trying to reign in the potentially destructive power of AI — decided to boo the video. Loudly. And frequently.
Stop resisting the tech utopia they’re trying to build for you, or you’re literally doomers. Never mind that the people building said tech utopia are also doomers, but that’s different, because they worry about the real dangers like acausal robot basilisks torturing them for all eternity and not about petty shit like unemployment and poverty.
Speaking of stopping resisting, another, more critical article about this conference has some real bangers they left out in the other one -- I wonder why. It has some sneers, too.
> […] tech journo Kara Swisher—saying stuff like “you need to stop resisting and starting learning” about AI […].
Yep, that's an actual quote. I'm filing that one under examples of being completely tone-deaf alongside "Do you guys not have phones?".
> […] every company will use AI to “figure out how” to become “more efficient.”
I’m sure the toxic productivity community on YouTube will gobble that shit up. It reminds me of that clown who made a video on how to consume media more efficiently by watching anime on 2x speed and skipping the "boring parts". I guess when we eliminate all human value from entertainment products, that might become a valid strategy.
Mii @awful.systems I wrangle code, draw pictures, and write things. You might find some of it here.