I think that the way it works is if you have no proof then it didn't happen if you do in the most irrefutable form its convenient if it somehow magically proves their innocence instead of their guilt.
Also a lot of them identity more so with the perps
Great book no reason not to enjoy it just because he's a pos
45 out of 215 Democrats voted for that or around 21% vs 90% of Republicans. This means that the crazy option is wildly unpopular and would never pass under a democrat. I'm not seeing the problem here.
So someone has say 2 million in real estate and 1.5 million in other Investements. They are at risk of losing some of that 3.5M while still counting themselves wealthy and the government who can't afford to provide a whole laundry list of shit for normal people just hands them a few million to ensure their bad decisions don't cost them anything.
How about we don't subsidize your insurance and if you suck up you just lose your money.
It doesn't say that it says most of their costs are fixed and cost of those large fixed costs are more so amortized per head than per kWh which means higher rates for less usage.
Your ID proves you were here legally wherein the government has a record of your birth certificate existing even if you don't physically have said certificate on your person.
Now if we want to prove you weren't granted birthright citizenship which is absolutely and totally irrefutably a thing that trump can't legally change by fiat you would have to reference your parents which should again be on the birth cert which again the US in fact does already possess even if you have lost your copy.
There is no such thing as an abortion survivor. Abortions after viability are done because the baby is dead/dying or the mom is at risk. Wherein an abortion is done for the life of the mother and the baby is otherwise viable the mom is already induced early rather than simply killing the baby.
This leaves solely and only the case where the abortion is done to preserve the mom's life and the baby is too early for viability. A medication abortion is when the baby is a lump of cells which can't develop outside the body. A surgical abortion for a pre-viable fetus eg too late to be a lump of cells but too early to live...invariably terminates it.
There is no situation where this is a thing.
You could easily be paying 19 for the 2022 and if you have good credit you might not have any difference in interest rates and paying the same payment will pay 19 off faster than 26.
The person said the people on the road were responsible for the climate issue when individual decisions other than whom to vote for often has limited impact. If we want to effect meaningful change we need collective action on the part of our nation and government not just individuals.
Putting the blame on individuals knowing that the sum total effect of best case individual action means jack shit is a way to defect attention away from the decision makers whose actions actually have some hope of changing our trajectory.
things like food service and retail, which are distributed and local enough that anybody working such a job should be picking one they live near
This is a pretty huge fantasy. Jobs like that have a strong tendency to be clustered around expensive business districts where those who work can't afford to live. The average commute is half an hour by car or an hour by bus.
people are largely too poor to live close to work.” No, they largely are not.
Outside of your fantasies they actually are. The average single family home is now 589k and many old folks are burning down the equity in their home rather than passing them down. Also its not much of a solution to tell everyone to move in from suburbia to the city to rent from a slumlord when there isn't enough housing there NOW. A fraction could move in but it doesn't scale to the rest of them until we actually build more housing in the places people want to live.
People are largely too poor to live close to work and anyone who works the kind of inconsistent shifts lots of peoplework can't carpool. They also aren't the ones fighting work from home
It’s not cutting government programs, it’s cutting the amount of people needed to run a program,” Tillia told the Post. “They are cutting staff, which could actually increase the amount of the programs that we get.
Back in reality the only way to realize substantial savings is to cut benefits, those people eliminated are needed for you to get benefits at all and only Congress can create new programs.
Here she is a poor person on community assistance thinking she can support throwing people just like herself out of a job and somehow end up with more free shit.
Anyone think she will learn when they change her address to a slab of cardboard on the corner?
Why wouldn't they just slowly snipe you to death whike you waste trillions after the initial conflagration?
Totally aside from the economic collapse initiated by internal and external strife over this.
There are no blue MAGA. MAGA is a specific death cult around a charismatic Hitler figure who want to murder their neighbors, promote hate, and promote a white Isis like Christian state.
What the fuck is blue maga people who drive electric cars and support gay pride?
The question is why anyone would answer "why" have they never worked any of the types of job where people depend on each others effort in real time? Like 99.9% of low end jobs are like that.
Case fatality rate could be up to 50%. As mild cases are almost certainly entirely uncounted and the version that passes person to person will be a different variant we don't know if we are looking at something like covid or a fast moving black death.
So the rest of the day can be used for work. If you start at 930 everyone on time fucks off for half an hour