Skip Navigation

masimatutu

@ masimatutu @nerdica.net

34
57
3 yr. ago

Stay tuned for more useless language facts!

  • Friendica (open source facebook alternative) releases version 2023.12 with the ability to curate feeds and more

  • Friendica (open source facebook alternative) releases version 2023.12 with the ability to curate feeds and more

  • No complaints so far. I'm not using many new features, but I really like the new user interface.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • Erik Moeller on Mastodon: There's a common false dichotomy about Threads [...]

  • Yeah, say that to Biden...

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • For some weird reason in the implementation of the AP protocol, lemmy posts are seems as just a link on mastodon, the replies are complete though.

    ActivityPub allows two post formats, Notes and Articles. Articles support titles and therefore posts on Lemmy and threads on /kbin use them, while notes do not and are therefore used for microblogging and commenting. Currently Mastodon's article federation only goes so far as linking the post for content, and to be honest I'm doubtful whether Threads will federate Articles at all given their carefulness with federation.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • You're confusing defederation with Lemmy's instance blocking. Defederation means that none of a server's content is federated. Lemmy's new instance blocking feature, however, only blocks communities and not users.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • That's not how federation works. If you're on an instance that doesn't allow Threads, you won't see them at all, even when viewing posts coming from other instances.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • Also,

    We are on lemmy.

    I'm not ;)

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • You know that if you actively blocked the instances that are federated with Threads you wouldn't have seen this post, right (lemmy.world/instances)? I'm also only active on instances that block Threads, but blocking those who don't is an excessive measure.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • The thing is, you don't really see anything from the Microblogging Fediverse around here at all, do you, so why would you from Threads? And Meta will only explicitly collect your data if you follow one of their accounts, which is impossible from Lemmy. So in a Lemmy context it is quite irrelevant.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • But they won't. Seeing how little even the relatively federation-conscious Mastodonians interact with Lemmy, from Threads it will be close to zero (especially since the devs are very "careful" with federation and probably won't display article-formatted posts anytime soon).

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • No, that's just Lemmy. On Masto it blocks all interactions from users (including prohibiting them from following you and therefore fetching your posts).

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • I'm just saying that even on federated instances the users can choose to block Threads, and that that gives the same result for them. There's no need to force the hand of the user; there are more than enough corpo-critical people on Fedi for it not to be taken over by Meta.

    Edit: And I understand that allowing interaction with Meta is very risky business. Which is why I like the approach of instances like social.coop which restrict interaction from Threads but still give the user a choice.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • It really depends on the instance. There are many cozy, non-mainstream corners on the Fediverse. For instance, beehaw.org is as pleasant as can be.

  • Erik Moeller on Mastodon: There's a common false dichotomy about Threads [...]

  • It actually isn't that big. It grew a lot initially because people on Instagram were practically forced to join (or so I've heard), but then activity died down very quickly (www.cnn.com/2023/08/03/tech/th…).

    I'd say the ability to interact with the high-profile accounts on threads via Masto makes it a much more attractive alternative for many, although I personally have no interest in doing so.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • By all means, fuck Meta to the moon and back, but for goodness' sake, users on federated servers can choose to block the domain with the same result, not to mention that admins can simply restrict it (see social.coop/@eloquence/1115888…). It just isn't so black and white as people are making it seem.

    Federation with a bigger platform is realistically the only way for Fedi to become mainstream, and at the moment Meta seems at least to be trying to be communicative. And with their quite unvaluable userbase they really don't have enough leverage against the privacy-concious Fediverse to turn AP into MetaPub. For now.

  • Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

  • Fediverse @lemmy.ml
    masimatutu @nerdica.net
    ...

    Erik Moeller on Mastodon: There's a common false dichotomy about Threads

  • Mastodon founder touts Threads' federation, saying it makes his X rival 'a far more attractive option'

  • Thing about the Fediverse is that software is just software; what you should care about is the instances. There are a whole bunch of Mastodon instances that have already defederated long ago. A few big ones include mas.to, mstdn.social and troet.cafe; you can find the rest here: fedipact.veganism.social/.

  • Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation

  • I just thought the entire point of the Fediverse was kind of the ability to access any content, regardless where you choose to be. This is not only directly complicated by defederation, it also adds a whole new layer of complexity for new users, for whom this idea of decentalisation is already quite off-putting.

  • Fediverse @lemmy.ml
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation

  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    It's that time of the year again!

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    rule

  • Comics @lemmy.ml
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    "Silent Night" by War and Peas

  • Jokes and Humor @beehaw.org
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    Who is by far the biggest cellist of all time?

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    browser rule

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    Mastodon has the responsibility to promote diversity in the Fediverse

  • Fediverse @lemmy.ml
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    Mastodon has the responsibility to promote diversity in the Fediverse

  • test @mander.xyz
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    Just trying another way to post from Friendica

  • me_irl @lemmy.ml
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    me_irl

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    Solid advice rule

  • Memes @lemmy.ml
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    Solid advice

  • Memes @lemmy.ml
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    do you guys have this movie?

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    masimatutu @nerdica.net

    rule