...it's not a part of the discussion. Do keep up if you're going to weigh in. I know English sucks, and it really does, but it's the easiest language to learn the basics of for a reason
It's less "we will never get rich", which is objectively incorrect given China is part of BRICS and was rich long before brics was created, and more, "why the fuck is less than 8% of the world entitled to the wealth of over 60%?"
That's not a common interpretation of those words in that order, which would be fantastic if there were a competition for most unique and obtuse construing of sentences; however whether or not such a contest exists, this isn't a part of it.
Oops, opium wars backfired a bit didn't it?
If you think nonviolence is core to the left wing, you need to go ahead and find a nice subreddit to join. Liberals aren't left wing.
In a world United against the US, there's no war the US can wage effectively. There's only so much power you can project from aircraft carriers, and nukes are essentially off the table.
BRICS was also designed for exactly this scenario; a rogue US finally showing its whole ass to the world. They'll survive regardless of what the US tries, whether it's sanctions, tariffs or invasions.
Are black Americans oppressed in the US by being put in prison? Is it because they're black or because they're poor and thus more likely to need to do crime in order to survive?
If there were a solution that brought the entirety of black Americans out of poverty by locking up the most dangerous 10% of them after a jury trial and conviction until they were rehabilitated, while massively investing in majority black areas to ensure poverty is no longer a thing in those areas, would you do it?
This isn't whataboubtism, before you fail to report me for that.
Also Hong Kong was colonized until it was returned to China, it was never independent. I'm sorry white people lost their tax haven.
And you call me propagandized... No, people in jail aren't disappeared because they lost their right to talk to the press. No, there is not a global network of secret police arresting Chinese people. No, China is not alone in blocking travel to their country for hate speech or other bigotry.
If you believe these things, and you seriously see no problem with them, you aren't able to speak on politics. It'd be like discussing consent with a Mormon or physics with a flat earther... I mean seriously, a global network of secret police stations in other countries? Complete control of the speech of 1,400,000,000 humans?
This is as ridiculous as the 'Jewish new world order' stuff a lot of you people believe
Climate change + no future prospects under capitalism + lack of support structure due to overworked parents + crushing poverty in many cases. Japan has a lot of homeless and near homeless children.
Short term pain for long term freedom is needed. If people had your point of view during the American civil war, you'd be the Confederate states of the US.
Every day people are the ones enabling and holding up fascism, not the uniforms, not the leadership, just people like you and your loved ones. Without you fascists have no power. Pressuring those around you, sabotaging their work if it's helpful to the fascists, socially isolating those that refuse to help are the effective steps to take. If you don't take them, you're as bad as any fash with a gun or suit.
By no definition of fascism is China fascist. Reread your Eco.
The government is the people. A fifth of the Chinese public are cpc members. It costs nothing to join, there are no requirements besides being a citizen and not being a convicted traitor. Anyone can join and start voting and participating.
And again, no, it's not a different system. I get that you're angry you'll never own your home in the US, whereas 92% of Chinese adults over 21 own their own home, but that doesn't change reality. The 'lease' is that your land is under the Chinese government, not the US government or Russians government, and thus subject to the laws in China and can be revoked if you use your land in a revolution against China.
Every single country on earth has this clause. Every single one. China assigns it per deed, rather than an overarching law, because of the autonomous districts that have different leases, like Tibet or Xinjiang.
Those not working to dismantle fascism are fascists.
...the 'lease' is that you don't own it independent of the government, as in despite owning the land you're not your own country. You'll find this in every country, except in China it's spelled out. It has an expiration since, you know, China tends to reform itself over time. None have expired, and right now under current law none of them can expire, they are automatically renewed to the owner at the time of expiry, with the assumption the owner isn't going to commit treason.
Like the 'social credit score' nonsense you people made up, it's a gross misinterpretation of reality that you believe because you fundamentally believe Chinese people are different than you.
Political power is enabled by the barrel of a gun; and the belief in said power.
If either of these fail for a political institution, and no one with a gun restores it, then it simply no longer applies.
If you want your constitution to matter, [censored by .world global rules]; I mean convince the people with guns that you're right.
PTB, .world is trash, nearly all other news communities are better.