For sure, I am very aware of the overlying issue here. And let it be known that I have always been supportive of the movement.
Ignorant passerby here, and genuinely want to change my mind, but how exactly is it fair for a trans person to compete against a biologically female person?
If we go back to the original reason for this sexist devide, it stems from a fundamental biological difference between two genders. How we identify ourselves has little impact on these biological differences no?
Furthermore I was listening to a podcast recently and they were talking about how the greatest female tennisplayer to have ever lived is would be ranked 2 or 3 thousand in a unisex world ranking. Seeing a worldrecord being set by someone working within the confines of the female body is impressive, seeing that same record broken by someone without the same constraints just devalues the other persons achievement.
I assume neither did he, but we found complaint tablets elsewhere, so definitely notorious
I see him more as a Trump-esque figure, doing bad business delivering bad product claiming to be the best. I'd watch EA-NĀṢIR having a breakdown and character arc
You wanna go back to BBS? Cause I'll go back to BBS
for i in range(1, len(a)):
if a[i] < a[i-1]:
like_all_things_should_be = False
break
What's going on in Thanos' head in all that B-roll
Yeah that's the actual scary part, last time he didn't know the extent of how far they could go. Now after 4 years of preparation...
I wish y'all the best of luck, the world knows you need it
Spyware makes surveillance simple. The last ten years have seen a global market emerge for ready-made software that lets governments surveil their citizens and
Abstract
Spyware makes surveillance simple. The last ten years have seen a global market emerge for ready-made software that lets governments surveil their citizens and foreign adversaries alike and to do so more easily than when such work required tradecraft. The last ten years have also been marked by stark failures to control spyware and its precursors and components. This Article accounts for and critiques these failures, providing a socio-technical history since 2014, particularly focusing on the conversation about trade in zero-day vulnerabilities and exploits. Second, this Article applies lessons from these failures to guide regulatory efforts going forward. While recognizing that controlling this trade is difficult, I argue countries should focus on building and strengthening multilateral coalitions of the willing, rather than on strong-arming existing multilateral institutions into working on the problem. Individually, countries should focus on export controls and other sanctions that target specific bad actors, rather than focusing on restricting particular technologies. Last, I continue to call for transparency as a key part of oversight of domestic governments' use of spyware and related components.
Keywords: cybersecurity, zero-day vulnerabilities, international law, espionage
The project included 17 academic researchers from 12 universities who were granted deep access by Facebook to aggregated data.
> July 27, 2023, 8:00 PM CEST > By Brandy Zadrozny
The project included 17 academic researchers from 12 universities who were granted deep access by Facebook to aggregated data.
> The project included 17 academic researchers from 12 universities who were granted deep access by Facebook to aggregated data.
> July 27, 2023, 8:00 PM CEST > By Brandy Zadrozny