Wer mit Software arbeitet, weiss dass 10mal mehr Code nichts ist was als Firma sehr erstrebenswert ist. Und dass ist ungefƤhr alles worin LLMs gut sind. Unmengen an gerade-so-nutzbarem slop.
Ich leg das mal hier ab. https://www.suizidprophylaxe.de/hilfsangebote/hilfsangebote/
Alles in allem ist es recht angenehm, aber beim Modulimport hat FF einen Fall wo's ohne vernünftige Fehlermelldung abraucht. Ich schreib vielleicht einen Bugreport...
Ich iel wenn ich nach 3 Tagen 0 Features gebaut habe, aber dafür obskures Firefox-spezifisches Wissen über modulbasierte Worker-Threads gesammelt habe.
The comment section seems to be 50% that dude by word count. He must be a perfectly healthy amount online.
I'm interpreting your phrasing as you believing that the non-profit "taking over" is somehow good, because profit motive bad presumably. But regardless of incentives, everyone involved is trying to flood the world with slop by incinerating cash and processors on industrial scales.
But so far the cash incinerator has been running on speculative financial products issued by a club of esoteric computer scientists trying to awaken the robot god. Investors are slightly uncomfortable with this, so Sammy boy is trying to offer them a more traditional vehicle to incinerate their cash (while indulging in his personal profit motive a bit).
You're certainly hitting some nails on their heads here. The normalisation of AI is absolutely happening, mostly because the buttons start showing up on Google/Microsoft/etc. products with massive market share.
Also the manlyman blogs bitching about beaver hair brushes. I was looking up safety razors in german ("Rasierhobel" btw, totally unaware of that until now), and Wikipedia was referencing one such archived blog, bitching about pig bristle brushes being "drug store" garbage. I might still get one. (The razor that is, not the brush. Spray on foam will do for me.)
Not so sure about the scythe/mower thing. My battery powered mower & motor scythe slap. (Stihl btw)
While browsing some german news media outside my usual territorry (DW and tagesschau), and was fooled by this chameleon of an ad on the front page of WELT (trying for classy, but obvious conservative bias).
The heading means "Bitcoin could protect from inflation". If you want to check out some retail investor shilling in the wild, here you go!
archive: https://archive.is/4RT80
I can see tante's point. Besides AI datacenters being used for surveillance tech, I can also see LLM tech itself used nefariously post-bubble. Maybe maintaining an up-to-date LLM as a product is not viable, but a custom-trained model to snipe public online discourse around a crucial election could remain affordable for a wealthy fascist.
On the bright side, I am hoping for a brief period of powerful yet affordable gaming PCs thanks to retrofitted, slightly singed Blackwells.
A few months ago, Casey Newton of Platformer ran a piece called "The phony comforts of AI skepticism," framing those who would criticize generative AI as "having fun," damning them as "hyper-fixated on the things [AI] can't do." I am not going to focus too hard on this blog, in

Didn't come up with that simile, but it might fit:
It's like a fleshed out version of a 12 year old thinking "everything would be great if I was in charge, because I'm smart and people are dumb"
Something about people who are too impressed with their own smarts and swap pet theories that make them feel smart.
Honestly the most surprising part was when she went "of course we know fanfiction can be used for cult indoctrination, ever since that other cult did it"
I skipped that episode because it seemed boring, but now I might come back to it.
be me, super genius autodidact
be deeply moved by the prospect of defeating death with technology, write some sick prose about it because am eloquent as fuck
proceed to punt this goal decades or centuries by helping to justify a tech bubble which consumes tons of R&D resources for no apparent benefit and will bind further resources in the future to adapt to an aggravated climate crisis, and also inspiring a slew of technofascists too dumb to tell the difference between tech that benefits mankind and tech that exploits and oppresses
mein face when
YouTube Video
Click to view this content.
I haven't watched it. I don't know how well she will cover the subject or how deep the rabbit hole she will venture.
All I know is she's delightful and I sure as hell won't read that bilge myself, so I'm looking forward to an entertaining summary.
Edit: I watched it. I had a good time.
First I thought "Oh jeez, what a wall of text" but now you gave me my own thoughts that I want to share.
I don't think callling genAI output "not art" is a very defendable statement. I believe art is ultimately a type of activity, and one that is very hard to draw a strict line around. If I find a cool piece of driftwood and frame it, did I do art? That's kind of what that artist did when he picked his album cover.
But I also share your sentiment about "AI artists" pretending to work in a medium of which they understand 0% of the nuance. I think it makes more sense to call those people hacks instead of "not artists", because that's what you call people who use shallow, formulaic methods to dabble in a medium of which they are wholly incompetent.
And finally, AI as toolset does of course uniquely pander to hacks.
I always thought you could do interesting stuff with genAI, especiall when it goes into mangled, uncanny-valley territory. Though I can only think of examples for visual generators, like this album cover or the AI Pizza commercial.
The only text-based example that comes to mind is I forced a Bot to write this Book and that's just a guy imitating LLM writing style. (Hillarious though!)
....pirating them at all instead of learning Inkscape & Krita.
Yes, deceitful corporations are truly a troubling new phenomenon, which brings them closer to the baseline for evil: democratic governments
High IQ politics hour over here.
18:30
[Reporter Dude] If you launch the coin, isn't it unfair for you to snipe the coin?
[Shitcoin Wizard] ponders deeply I would say no.
[Reporter Dude] WTF did he just say that on the record?
For those who just can't shake their Wordle habit:
32 times the Wordle and none of the NYT enshittification
Soft-serve machines get a not-quite-parfait exemption to DMCA circumvention rule.

Character.AI Teen Suicide Lawsuit refers to a controversy and lawsuit against the user-generated artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot website Character.AI

archive of the mentioned NYT article
Businesses using artificial intelligence to generate code are experiencing downtime and security issues, according to Sonar CEO.

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/25239919
So I recently got an excuse rant about my opinions on federated tech. I think it's pretty much the best we can hope for in terms of liberating tech, with very few niches where fully distributed tech is preferable.
Needing a server places users under the power of the server administrator. Why do we bother? "No gods, no masters, no admins!' I hear you shout. Well, there's a couple reasons...
Maybe using software is just an intrinsically centralized activity. One or a few people design and code it, and an unlimited number of people can digitally replicate and use it. Sure, it may be free software that everyone can inspect and modify... but how many people will really bother? (Nevermind that most people don't even have the skills necessary.)
Okay, so we always kind of rely on a central-ish dev team when we use tech. Why rely on admins on top of that? I believe the vast vast majority of people doesn't have the skills and time to operate a truly independent node of a fully distributed tech. Let's take Jami as an example:
"With the default name server (ns.jami.net), the usernames are registered on an Ethereum blockchain."
So a feature of Jami is (for most users) implemented as a centralized service. Yikes. You could build and run your own name server (with less embarrassing tech choices hopefully), but who will really bother?
But say you bothered, wouldn't it be nice if your friends could use that name server too, and gain a little independence? That sounds a lot like decentralized/federated tech.
Keeping a decent service online is a pain in the butt. Installing SW updates, managing backups, paying for hardware and name services... nevermind just the general bothering to understand all that mess. And moderation, don't forget moderation. I'm saying it's not for everyone (and we should appreciate the fuck out of [local admin]).
I believe that servers and admins are our best bet for actual non-centralized tech. A tech-literate person tending a service for a small- to medium-size community is much more feasible than every person running their independent node (which will probably still depend on something centralized).
And maybe that's just the way we bring good ol' division of labour to the Internet. You have your shoemaker, your baker, your social media admin. A respectable and useful position in society. And they lived happily ever after.
Questioning the design and dev progress was apparently "against company policy."

Apparently a senior SW engineer got fired for questioning readiness of the product, dude must still be chuckling to himself.
Found the story here https://hachyderm.io/@wesley83/112572728237770554