Did you equate health issues caused by lack of physical activity and excessive eating to racism? I can't even... Okay, if you want to ignore all the medical and scientific evidence, ignore them. It is your body and you are the one to face the consequences.

But being fat is not the same as being black. People do not get sick and die 30 years earlier because they are black, for instance. People are black not because they ignore physical exercises and eat too much. I don't support bullying, but acting like this is a normal condition that we should cherish is wrong.

If you are in a rush, why did you ask Windows to install updates?

Well, this community is not private, so people here will hear sensible opinions from time to time.

There are many AI companies, including those that are based in countries where people communicate in other languages. What you are saying is not an insurmountable problem.

In English yes. But the less popular the language is, the less materials there are. With this you can take any book and simplify it to your level. Unlike mass-produced books, AI can be very flexible.

I'm not a native speaker. For books where the authors use words anyone else is hardly using, this can be really helpful. But not in this example. However even a simple book like this one can be shortened, which some people can find useful. I see no harm.

Yeah, but then it's easier to download the whole game rather than buying a CD/DVD drive.

Then you get a drive, but the game you loved is no longer playable since the server it is using to confirm its license has been offline for years.

You might be shocked, but it is a joke.

I don't think Spotify was created with deaf people in mind. It's unfair to imply the company did this on purpose to worsen their lives. I bet they didn't even think about this use-case. I agree that deaf people should be able to enjoy music, and Spotify can do something to help. But it's not that simple. For example, how would they charge people who can hear, but offer the service for free to those who can't? It's not as easy as this post makes it seem. That's why I wrote my first comment.

Tribalism. Our tribe is good, their tribe is bad. If you are not with your tribe, you are a traitor, so people are pressurized into this, and start believing lies about our glorious pride and wise leaders.

But the feature works exactly the same for deaf and not deaf people, we've established that already. Well, at least you agreed that you were lying and manipulating. I will take the win.

You are not explaining how hearing works. You are manipulating. You are manipulating by equating one's ability to hear with a Spotify feature. These are not the same thing, and comparing them is not correct.

No, they don't. This feature works exactly the same regardless of what your ears can or can't do.

Why do they think that they are entitled to free lyrics?

Let's not dramatize. Red Bull has Perez, Ferrari kept Raikkonen after he had been demolished by Alonso in 2014. It's not like weak drivers is the daddy's invention.

Climate change, antibiotics resistance, that kind of stuff. A slow and boring apocalypse instead of what we see in the movies.

Okay, I need recommendations. What is the best video about the recalled Shrek toy?

And not when your client is a Netflix app on your smart tv.