While in principle, I don't disagree. If you're impaired, you shouldn't drive. I lost a parent after they were hit by a drunk driver.
However, there are monstrously different amounts of impairment. You have reaction times and motor skills, decision making and judgement, awareness and attention.
Implying any type of impairment to be an unequivocal "no" to driving is short sighted, in my opinion. It's the easy argument to point at any mind-altering substance: caffeine, tobacco, or antidepressants could be classified an impaired driver.
It's also worth pointing out that even different emotions could dramatically alter driving performance. Not that we would ever think about restrictions on crying while driving.
I mean, he was speaking at the Black Conservative Federation. It's sorta relevant just given the venue.
There's no reason that guilt would be absent from helpinghelp a specific person in need (like your struggling mother example). Plenty of people feel guilty taking handouts and will outright refuse help when they might need it.
As for the drive thru thing, I think you might be talking about something different than what I've seen/done, which is just paying for your own meal and the people behind you. There isn't any expectation for them to continue some chain, and in many ways it's a bit of an empty gesture (they are just taking that first person's goodwill and passing it to the next in line).
My interpretation of paying it forward is the premise of receiving something when you're in need, then, when you're able, to give something back. Not to the one who helped you, as that would be repaying a debt.
I guess I'm out of the loop. I'm definitely biased, but I would be very surprised to hear that Jack Black did anything that would warrant my skepticism.
water that is wet
Oh geez, better be careful making controversial statements like that.
I'm a bit miffed as to why he just rattled off those things at the end. Are those "sources" supporting his statement? Or saying they're complicit? Or is he just giving shoutouts to his buddies?
Curious as to why that would be the case. Unless people are starting videos, letting them buffer, then reloading and doing it again.
It should be the same amount of bandwidth, otherwise, right?
On first glance, this was so clearly a beautiful render of a bad Minecraft landscape generation
If that's a joke, I don't get it.
If that's real, I don't know why.
Help?
I did always wonder the logistics behind that. Did those businesses get reimbursed from the contest runners? I like the idea of them trading in their piles of caps for cash
Do they need a "strategy" when the whole point of a primary is to find a suitable candidate?
Amusing that Jerry is omitted from that screenshot
This seems to be the limit. One more very and it 404s
In the same way that watching porn on public transit is a social no-no
Saved a click: It was GTA 5 for the top downloads. And it's only looking at Playstation 5 downloads
There are a ton of things you can do with a keyboard natively on Android. I would imagine these use that plus a bit of software to emulate "real" movements, like the flicking down to scroll