benni @ benni @lemmy.world

Posts

27

Comments

203

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's true that NNs are strong at spotting patterns in masses of data, but trading is a particularly hard problem for this kind of task because the market constantly adapts to its participants. If other traders have found a pattern, it will already be priced in when you try to make money off it, and your strategy will fail. And since trading is a worldwide competition with billions of dollars to be won, you are naturally competing against teams of the best of the best who are willing to put massive resources into their algorithm development, computing, and data acquisition. Therefore the chances for someone like us to find an algorithm that systematically beats them is very low.

So for any young math/CS nerd who comes across this thread and wants to try their luck, be aware of the difficulty before you invest any real money, and learn about the merits of passive investing.

Same, have you tried WaniKani for learning the Kanji and vocabulary? It's great.

There's a Linux package manager joke to be made here, unfortunately I'm too sleepy to come up with it.

The proof is trivial and has been left out as an exercise for the reader.

I think you mean tuples, because (1) == 1, but (1, ) == tuple([1]).

Many programming languages allow "trailing commas":

    
my_list = [ 1, 2, 3, ]

  

This is wonderful because you can treat the last element like the previous ones instead of having to make an exception. I use it all the time, even when it provides no benefit, and I think we should even start allowing it in natural language.

That's the plot of Uzumaki.

Hey, you're finally awake.

"It's a good life we lead, Luigi."

"The best. May it never change."

"And may it never change us."

Goosebumps every time. I'll never forgive Bowser for what happened.

Don't know, I've never been to the US.

I'd definitely pick 3.

First of all, if you can only eat with one spoon, you might as well pick a cool-looking one. Imagine being at a social event and people are handing out spoons to eat soup or whatever, and you're like "no thanks, I always eat with this spoon I brought from home". That would be kinda cringe and weird if you pick a spoon with a boring basic design. But if you pick the third one with it's interesting demon handle, it's gonna make you look mysterious. People are going to wonder and ask you about the story behind the spoon. Women will giggle at you and ask if you'd share the spoon with them.

Secondly, it has the most generally useful shape. Being smaller than the others can be very useful for eating from some containers. It has corners instead of being perfectly round, which allows a bit of scraping. But because the corners are rounded, you don't have to worry about leaving scratches or carving microplastics out of plastic containers.

Habe die Serie (Dexter) vor ein paar Tagen erst angefangen. Soweit sehr gut geschrieben und unterhaltsam. Empfehlenswert 👍

You can hide it in a shoebox in your attic and repost it in ten years. Reality is often mundane, but it's up to us to turn our stories into reality ❤

That's what niche internet communities are for. Save it, it's all yours my friend.

No, I made this meme yesterday after googling for pictures of this notification.

Had to read this a few times, it was a bit of a /c/aneurysmposting moment for me.

Sorry, nein, die Begriffe negativ und nichtnegativ sind klar definiert und beziehen sich darauf ob eine Zahl kleiner 0 oder größer gleich 0 ist. Wegen -0==0 ist -0 damit nichtnegativ.

std::signbit ist ein interessanter Punkt, ich würde vermuten, dass diese Funktion, wie der Name suggeriert, nur das sign bit bestimmen soll, und dass beim Verfassen der Doku nicht darüber nachgedacht wurde, ob die Bezeichnung "negativ" auch auf den Sonderfall -0 zutrifft.

🤓🤓🤓

Laut IEEE-Standard ist -0 gleich +0 beim Vergleich, auch wenn es sich in manchen anderen Operationen anders verhält als +0. Damit ist es doch nichtnegativ.

Ich verstehe nicht, was die Existenz neutraler Zahlen damit zu tun hat.

I don't get it, can you explain?

Blaze, haha. Where did you find this one?!