andallthat @ andallthat @lemmy.world

帖子

3

评论

460

加入于

2 yr. ago

Yes it did. Making up variation of the same story in order to farm upvotes used to be done by humans.

But the strategy of throwing shit at the wall and see what sticks has now been industrialized with AI, because the machine can produce tons of cheaper, faster, smellier shit.

Reddit and generally socials are basically the perfect application for AI. Unreliable results are not a bug but a feature. You have thousands of humans helpfully training it for free by up or downvoting the result. And the AI companies get a machine trained to persuade large groups of people of any made-up story.

Oh, new intelligence has just emerged that your country's government is supporting a terrorist organization that sending drugs to the US! /s

Almost right, but the "I think" sounds out of character.

I like how there are all these terms with increasingly loose definitions, to which we attach different levels of evilness:

• algorithm - older, reliable, deterministic except when it's "The Algorithm" in capital letters like "The Social Media Algorithm"; then it becomes evil
• machine learning - been out for decades, hasn't destroyed the world, mostly does its job undetected. Used mainly by technical people
• machine intelligence - The machine is starting to become conscious but it is still generally helpful. "Machine intelligence" performs brain surgery, detects tumors, folds and unfolds proteins, whatever that means (but it sounds like a good thing, so we'll give it a pass)
• artificial intelligence - machine intelligence's evil twin. Takes credit for everything good that comes from the other ones and we tend to believe it, because it's the only one we can actually speak to and can lie to us very convincingly. On its own it can draw pretty pictures and animate them, write code that occasionally works, pretend to love us and teach us the most effective way to slash our own wrists

One day we'll read some of these comments and laugh at how shortsighted they were.

Of course we'll probably have to read them on a manuscript or smeared on a wall with feces because all the world's resources will be used by the huge datacenters that power our AI overlords

so... NATO-minus-the-US are considering creating a committee to discuss maybe retaliating AND they are helpfully announcing their intentions to Russia?

I know nothing of diplomacy, foreign politics or war but what the f#@k is this? If NATO did have the strength and consensus to do something like that, wouldn't they just launch a cyber attack and then immediately deny that anything happened? If we AREN'T already actively doing at least some light sabotaging in Russia, how do I return my NATO loyalty card?

If someone is declaring something like that, it strikes me as a declaration of weakness for EU-internal reasons. It's a call for the EU to start preparing to maybe start having this kind of capabilities in the next 10-15 years. And I fully hope I'm wrong and that there's a better, 4D-chess type of strategy behind this.

EDIT: I don't mind the downvotes, but why? I WANT to be wrong on this so I'd really like to read a comment that explains why.

If I know anything at all after I'm dead, I will already have the answer to the biggest question from all major religions

I'm appalled at all these people who condone throwing flour and eggs at politicians. Everyone knows that the egg goes first, because it helps the flour stick.

"We need to resolve the root cause of the conflict", insists the root cause of the conflict

"I'm not a Nazi, I just like the esthetics of someone else's blood on my black uniform"

It's almost like "you have to buy a new laptop to install it and help train our AI on your private documents" is somehow not convincing enough. Maybe if they also removed local accounts and forced you to have an online MS account? Nah scratch that, it would be stupid

Etymology, slogans, rhymes or catchy acronyms give our brains the illusion of hearing something that makes sense. Repeating them a million times drills them in your neural pathways. Plus they are easy to scream loud enough to drown any attempt at intelligent conversation.

That's right-hand populist communication in a nutshell.

Not unique, but still how safe is to create a new powerful army when the forces against democracy could just democratically take control of it?

but can YOU do it before I finish my coffee?

Grok likes to finish on his face and some went in his eyes

Look, I have my share of frustrating experiences with AI every day because we're being pushed to use it at work and for most tasks it's... umderwelming.

But people do use it. Be it for doing stupid memes, planning their days, life coaching or searching the web. And as a company you want to be where your customers are. AI companies are basically just trying to push usage, now, by spending huge amounts of cash. That's why they do big talks about AGI but they are all creating freaking AI browsers.

Once AI becomes the de-facto standard way people consume information, your company wants to be visible by AI, their products to be recommended by AI and purchasable from AI. Some companies might actually benefit from it, most will not (like it happened when everyone had to have an ecommerce site and shitty mobile app) but that's what I see happening.

Ah the good old times when we thought it couldn't get any eviler than Cheney...

you had me at "uncostitutional"

Trump

you can actually use them for useful things, like purchasing on such leading ecommerce sites as.... uh.... gettrumpfragrances.com and.... er... gettrumpsneakers.com.

Says you, my trolley is pretty hot!