That's not supported. We did support it in the past but deemed it too much of a hack and a maintenance nightmare. Software needs to explictely support it, and not much does.
Instead we rather mainline devices.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Plasma's Discover allows installing and updating exactly the same apps as GNOME's Software Center do. There is no "segmentation" there?
And that "standard packaging format that works on all Mobile Linux platforms" is basically Flatpak, and we support it. Not sure why Ubuntu Touch doesn't, but that's their problem, even SailfishOS supports it nowadays.
Sadly no.
Tbh although I loved the device, it's sadly dead in the water. No one is working on it and there is no mainline support to speak off. The display doesn't even work.
What is your reasoning for not just using capital letters where grammar requires it? I agree with OP, it makes it very annoying to read the way it is now.
You really need to give us more details than this, "bootimg_analyze fails" tells us exactly nothing. Also the best place for porting support would be our porting channel on Matrix, #porting:postmarketos.org, there are more people there knowledgeable about this.
I have the AMD edition and overall the laptop is nice but since I received the laptop about 9 months ago the screen broke 4 times. I only got it back 2 or so weeks ago from the repaircenter so I have only been able to actually use it for a few weeks.
So my experience is pretty terrible so far. I honestly have no faith the screen is durably fixed this time but let's see, I'm pretty done with it.
It definitely makes it less interesting and feels the opposite of what Framework wants to do.
I hope future models will be as replaceable and upgradable as their x86_64 machines.
Have you actually read the article? It mostly lists problems and reasons not to get a Tuxedo laptop.
I'd advise to go for a Framework machine instead, they actually have good Linux support and do not require custom software written in Electron...
Correction, hi postmarketOS dev here, we are using whatever the user wants. We ship Phosh, GNOME Mobile, Plasman Mobile, SXMO, Lomiri. We don't have just one interface.
Correction, hi postmarketOS dev here, we are using whatever the user wants. We ship Phosh, GNOME Mobile, Plasman Mobile, SXMO, Lomiri. We don't have just one interface.
That's not supported. We did support it in the past but deemed it too much of a hack and a maintenance nightmare. Software needs to explictely support it, and not much does. Instead we rather mainline devices.