Prunebutt @ Prunebutt @slrpnk.net

Posts

79

Comments

3,345

Joined

2 yr. ago

BITTE

SPRICH

Guten Rutsch

Now this is just tankie ragebaiting... I love it!

Honorable mention: Bookchin

Also: Baryon

That's not an ancap meme, tho.

But then they shouldn't interact with it. By commenting, they agree to the rules.

Oh violating the anarchist community rules huh

You're confusing anomy with anarchy.

Some kind of mutually agreed upon means of a community organizing itself perhaps, where even if an individual didn't decide them personally engaging within it binds them to a code of behavior?

That sentence is in reference to what, exactly? That sentence is unnecessarily hard to parse.

Dumbass lol.

First of all: rude and uncalled for. Second: That's rich from someone who thinks pointing out that an anarchist community has rules is a gotcha. 🙄

Like I said, all real socialists understand social contracts.

Good for them. Got anything to add that's not a non-sequitur?

Sovcits treat the law like it's some arcane art. Anarchists usually employ power analysis to uderstand where laws come from.

But social contract theory is employed by statists to justify the state. So ridiculing it is fair game without being called a sovcit.

actual socialists

rThis is an anarchist comm. While many anarchists consider themselves socialists: I don't think it's a good look to come into an anarchist comm and talk about how "actual socialists" don't do that. Could be seen as violating a rule here, even.

Individualist anarchists reject the social contract outright. But those are relatively rare.

There is a critique that contracts should be entered consentually. And collectivist anarchists generally are in favour of freedom of association. But you could argue that this is merely a semantic argument about social contract theory.

I don't agree with the last bit. What you do is what you are. But the rest is good.

To quote Chidi from the good place:

Well, principles aren't principles when you pick and choose when you're going to follow them.

but they were making the point that liberalism is the pillar of a moral society

Doesn't sound too anarchistic, tbh.

Who do you mean by "you" who is presumably "not sending [their] best"? I'm not "sending" squat.

Explain how anarchism is supposedly "liberal".

Liberalism is right wing.

Left and right wing are relative classifications. LIerals were left-wing in feudal times.

Both conservative and liberal criticisms of communism are right wing criticisms.

You should really learn to distinguish the contents of a critique from the party who uttered it. When liberals critizise the authoritarian structure of the USSR, that's a leftist critique.

Repeating Stalin's bullshit takes is really cringe, comrade.

Most anarchists are libertarian socialists (i.e. anarcho-communists), comrade.

Cowbee incoming...

The problem with folks posting this trash is that they never go past the basic economics part.

But sure, buddy: Rent control destroys housing and the two lines meet, which means people should starve. /s 🙄

Shrek and Sonic are obviously in a polycule.

NATO the only reason russia didn't attacked yet.

To reply to your crazy assumption with a quote by yourself:

And I'm the king of the Moon. Proofs or gtfo

NATO has no problem with dictators and queer-persecuting governments. Look at Turkey and Portugal at the time it was a founding member of NATO.