The front of "Active" is entirely two-day-old posts with 500 comments by debate bros. "Hot" is just "New."

The old fork had a much better Active sort. If it's not possible for different Lemmys to have different sorts (would is extremely weird, but Lemmy code is weird in general), then it should be upstreamed.

If you're wondering why it's like this, it's two parts:

• hot_rank is (slightly simplified) log(upvotes + 3) / (age_in_hours + 2)^1.8. This means every vote matters less than the last, but every hour costs more than the last. A brand new post with 1 vote is equal to an hour old post with 15 votes. It gets even more stacked when looking at posts with higher vote counts: a new post with 10 votes is equivalent to an hour old post with 120 votes.

• "Active" is just hot_rank but with the post age replaced with the time since the last comment. Every comment "bumps" the post; the age of the post does not matter at all until the two day cutoff is hit. Because hot_rank is overwhelmingly just "new", this is overwhelmingly just "newest comment" with a mild bonus to highly voted posts.

My first suggestion would be restoring the version of the sort from the fork. It worked for years.

Failing that, I would suggest replacing hot_rank with (upvotes+5)/(age_in_hours+5) (you can replace the 5s with any small positive number and get similar results). This will fix Hot, and improve Active, but Active will still be a dumpster fire, because the age is time since last comment, which still prioritizes flame wars. I would suggest changing Active entirely to use (comment_count + upvotes + 5)/(age_in_hours +5).

(PS: I'd go submit a PR but it'd out my real identity and I think it'd get ignored anyway.)

main

main

a crappie is a North American freshwater fish

I was using this shit, now it's going to be surprise transferred to a company that wants me to use their product instead of hosting things I control.

Fucking Google.

It has become clear that some of you need this.

First wave feminism:

• Focused on combating legally explicit oppression (mostly the right to vote).

• Succeeded in all their goals.

• Wish they had more goals lol.

Second wave feminism:

• Rekindled struggle for women's equality. This part is cool, enjoy it, because it's all downhill from here.

• New theoretical basis where women are the keepers of the ineffable moon spirit or some shit. (Okay fine, it's more nuanced than this, but not in a way worth giving a damn about.)

• Only cares about white women.

• Yes it's more nuanced than "ineffable moon spirit," but not in a way worth giving a damn about.

• We needed third wave feminism for a reason. Anybody who still identifies with second wave feminism either really likes ineffable moon spirits or is willing to put up with them so they can be a TERF.

Third wave feminism:

• Gendered oppression is just one of a number of different, sometimes overlapping, kinds of oppression in our society (also race, sexual orientation, gender expression, ability, etc). The loosely overlapping collection of kinds of oppression is called the kyriarchy.

• The ranking of people within the kyriarchy is intentionally loose. Who has less rights between a white trans woman and a black man with Asperger's? The answer will be determined on the fly, in whatever way is most convenient for people in power, in that moment, for that case.

• People facing overlapping kinds of oppression face different oppression than just the sum of the parts. The oppression that a black trans woman faces is different than the sum of the oppression a black person, trans person, and woman face. The best way to understand oppression is to look the complete intersection separately. This is called intersectionality.

• The best way to understand an intersection is to ask people who live in it. This does not mean leaving them to their own devices sans support, it means fucking ask.

• We will not win liberation for women until we win it for black women, trans women, disabled women, lesbians, and every other intersection with women. We will not win liberation for black people until we win it for black women, black trans people, disabled black people, gay black people, yadda yadda yadda and so forth for every other group.

Marxist feminism:

• Is still third wave feminism, all aspects of that apply.

• Let's add class as an axis of oppression within the kyriarchy.

• Hot damn, that turned out to be a really useful addition.

• Despite the name, not all Marxist Feminists understand class in the Marxist sense. A lot of the time they end up just meaning wealth rather than relation to the means of production. Wealth actually ends up being a useful thing to add to intersectionality too though, so I'd recommend adding both wealth and class (this time in the Marxist sense). \slaps roof of kyriarchy\ this bad boy can fit so many axes of oppression in it

• Class ends up being the most important axis of oppression. However, the other ones still matter. Marxist feminists is prone to over-simplifying things and pretending that only class matters. This is called class reductionism, and it makes you a bad feminist. It also makes you a bad organizer.

• Revisiting intersectionality with class: The oppression that a black transwoman worker is different than just the sum of the oppression a black person, trans person, woman, and worker face. (Aside: holy shit are trans people illustrative here; the difference in experience between a wealthy trans person and a poor one is stark as fuck.)

• We will not win liberation for the workers until we win it for black workers, trans workers, disabled workers, lesbian workers, female workers, and every other intersection with workers.