Honestly the minute they realize "liberals" are happy some of them are waking up, they'll probably get back in line. Most of them joined the cult to "own the libs" and that's the only thing they actually care about.

Not sure the whole internet was woke, the nazis and pedophiles have been here for quite a while too. But they were on the fringe and shunned by the larger internet culture until relatively recently. Trump started courting the votes of the worst side of the internet. Then the pandemic brought a bunch of "normies" online whose brains weren't ready for the culture shock, and rather than accepting the freaks and geeks, they decided the nazis were the normal ones.

Been my daily driver since 2007. And while I want to see this as a win, a part of me wonders if it's in part due to there just being fewer "desktop" users these days. So many people just use phones or tablets for everything, and Linux users tend to be the "power users" who are less likely to give up their PCs. Not saying there hasn't been some real growth lately, but just wondering how much of the growth is due to being a larger piece of a smaller pie.

20 thousand years of this, seven more to go.

- Bo Burnham, That Funny Feeling (written in 2020)

As someone just old enough to remember, we did have that with CFCs. Might not have been super mainstream, and nobody who would have done it out of spite really had the disposable income to actually do it.

I grew up in a Fundamentalist Christian "cult" and I remember the adults around me "joking" about it all the time. I remember a Missionary to northern Canada visiting our church (in rural America) to try to raise support talking about the temperatures and joking that it's so cold that he wanted to stand outside with an aerosol can in each hand to try to bring on some global warming, and that getting a laugh from the congregation. You might think that maybe it was a "harmless" joke that maybe as a child I didn't pick up on the sarcasm, but there were absolutely adults there who fully believed that there was nothing humans could do to damage the earth, because God takes care of it. "And how dare the government and these evolutionists try to tell us how to live."

Looking forward a TSA officer looking at me like an idiot for either not taking my shoes off or for taking my shoes off. It's comforting to know that no matter what I do, there's a TSA agent who will treat me like I'm a moron for following the same instructions I overheard them give the person in front of me.

Thought I might be one too, until the "tangents and nonlinear storytelling" as evidence of being human and the scene from Megamind where he goes "being bad is the one thing I'm good at" came to mind.

I'll admit I tried talking to a local deepseek about a minor mental health issue one night when I just didn't want to wake up/bother my friends. Broke the AI within about 6 prompts where no matter what I said it would repeat the same answer word-for-word about going for walks and eating better. Honestly, breaking the AI and laughing at it did more for my mental health than anything anyone could have said, but I'm an AI hater. I wouldn't recommend anyone in real need use AI for mental health advice.

As someone who was in Christian Schools/Home-School for my entire education, this is lowkey the real reason. Most won't (openly) admit it, but the whole Christian school movement was a response to desegregation. Eventually the reasons would grow into "we don't want our kids being taught Evolution" and now "we don't want our kids learning that LGBT exist" but the original reason was desegregation and racism.

As someone who has casually considered running for office in South Carolina (because our local representative is an incompetent buffoon, and while I don't consider myself qualified to run, I know I could do a better job), I kinda agree. If you want your representatives to be normal people, and understand what reality is like, then you really need to pay them at least a somewhat liveable wage, because as it stands, the only people who can afford to do the job are those who are basically independently wealthy, own a car dealership or some other business that basically runs itself, or are retired. I'm not saying politicians should be making boatloads of money. But their pay should also be a liveable wage for the area they represent.

Considering Eric Adams already is running as an independent, Cuomo is more likely to siphon votes away from him. Although I think it will be ranked choice anyway, so "splitting" the vote won't really matter.

I also want to think it's a little bit the management/CEOs who think their employees are their friends who get lonely realizing the stripper doesn't actually love them. Meanwhile they refuse to develop a personality or real friendships.

Not one of those gun people, but I still support the 2nd ammendment to some extent (down to ban AR-15s and other "scary-looking" guns simply because they are often used by mall-ninja types who do mass shootings). But I think most responsible gun owners are refusing to give fascists a reason/excuse to accelerate or escalate things (for the record, none of MAGA qualify as "responsible gun owners"). I know things are terrifyingly bad right now, but guns/violence are only going to make the current situation worse faster - at least for now. We do seem to be charging full-speed into a situation where they'll be helpful and useful, which is terrifying. But with as much as it might feel like an "easy fix" to nip things in the bud now, it's more likely to give fascism even more power and fuel for their propaganda.

So, I never believed the "Golden Dome" was going to actually be a thing, but wasn't the contract for that supposed to be going to one of Elon's companies? Is the project just off now? And follow-up question: is anything (short of scrambling some nearby jets) preventing Elon from "landing" a Falcon Heavy Rocket on the White House?

Wild that there's an AI-generated summary of the article before the article, on a story about the problems with AI. Also, is it that hard to ask your writers to write a summary of their own articles? Hasn't writing tweets (or similar microblog posts) already allowed most writers to develop the skill of writing a concise, simplified version of a story? Why are we entrusting this to AI when a human will be able to more accurately summarize their own article, and include appropriate nuance.

Apologies for the mini crash-out that isn't really related to the real story here. Thank you OP for sharing, and kudos to the MP for taking a stand.

Unironically a top-5 movie for me. It's bad, but it's also everything I want from a movie.

Elon Musk is #26 and Tracer is #27. So there are definitely some edgelords fucking around and messing with the stats.

Honestly, Valve should just become a worker-owned co-op when Gabe is gone. They already have the culture for it with their "desks on wheels" structure, where employees can move around the company to whatever project they are most interested in/can use their skills the most. That's usually one of the biggest hurdles to a company succeeding as a co-op, and Valve has been running that way for years.

Fakespot was somewhat accurate at catching when Amazon sellers take a well-reviewed item and swap out the product for another, by changing the title, description, and pictures. We've probably all read a review on Amazon that feels like the reviewer is posting a review of a completely different product, like a review that seems to be about a kitchen utinsil on a listing for an unusually affordable camera. It's a pretty common scam that Fakespot was pretty good at catching. It didn't seem as good at adjusting ratings for legit products and seemed to kind of randomly knock off a a half to one and a half stars on pretty much every listing, even on quality products.

Not saying it isn't a bad thing, but as Hank Green pointed out recently, remember that the "weight of a credit card" is at the high end of that estimate (the 5 grams) unless you are chewing on plastic pencaps or have unusually high exposure, you probably aren't getting that much per week. The range is really broad.

Now if we say more than one credit card a year? That uses the low end of the range, is still troubling, and isn't spreading misinformation that everyone is consuming a credit card worth of plastic every week.

Not being critical of you at all, I've quoted that myself in the past, but just wanted to spread the awareness about this stat that I had overlooked before too. And again, I'm not saying that much microplastic exposure is less bad health-wise, just that the "credit card a week" might be a bit sensationalized.