Skip Navigation
Anon is jealous
  • I mean sure, but the things people are prone to stealing physically, when they wouldn't otherwise but for price, tend to be those they must have just to live. That's not the sort of consumption we can ethically reduce.

  • Trump tariffs will make video game consoles up to 40% more expensive
  • I think the rich are more prone to buying new items. Eventually the prices of used items will rise as a result of demand, but not right away. No one needs a new game console, and few could not meet their needs with a used PC or laptop.

    Most in the US already have all of the above, but sure, this disproportionally "hurts" the poor.

  • Anon is jealous
  • Nope. Climate change is a pollution issue. Reducing consumption can reduce pollution, but paying or not paying for a digital copy of something has effectively zero cost in the form of natural resources or pollution.

  • Californians Voted Against Outlawing Slavery. Why Is Proposition 6 Failing?
  • Californians are the reasons I left California. Just like Americans are the reason I want to leave this country more and more each day of my life, but still, nothing about that first issue has changed for the better since I left.

  • Trump tariffs will make video game consoles up to 40% more expensive
  • The PC parts pipeline is ever-so-slightly more diverse, although the article does say Laptop prices could go up by 46% ...

    Look forward to more machines being assembled in other countries before hitting US soil, same as is already done for appliances by way of Mexico. Lack of imagination and industry knowlege on the part of whoever wrote the article, or just the desire to fear-monger.

    Frankly, prices rising is not something I care about. Taxing the rich has to start somewhere, even if its what the Dems should have been doing.

  • Yes, their platform was weak. But you seriously thought a fascist dictatorship was an acceptable alternative?
  • I personally know many who wanted the US out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, and trusted Trump over Hillary to do it. I know no-one who openly wanted the same and voted for her. I myself voted third-party the last two elections before this year, and Biden has only escalated our entanglements in middle-eastern conflics.

    Jesus, just look at Biden's rhetoric on Israel and Iran. Its downright bizarely pro-war, pro-genocide(in its failure to remotely acknowlege such is happening), and absolutely tone-deaf to what voters want.

    The fact that you yourself have now said what you've said on the topic proves the opposite of your claims. You know no conservatives today, and you mock the notion that anyone is against the war more than you point out any reason anyone should have voted for Harris over Trump.

    Muslims were a DNC lock-in vote till now, and absolutely no-one failed to warn them that was changing.

  • ~Half of the US for the last ~~24 hours~~ 8 years
  • The only significant policy change between the two was the legalization of weed. Can't tell me its the weed that made Harris less popular. In the end, she got my vote, where Hillary didn't, and still lost. Decades of conservative-lite policy momentum is a helluva stank, it turns out.

  • ~Half of the US for the last ~~24 hours~~ 8 years
  • Same things Hillary's book said. No amount of reduced foreign propoganda will make up for shit policies. If the propoganda against you is spouting as many truths and lies as you are, its your own damn fault.

    What Israel is doing in Gaza and the West Bank is genocide. Private Prisons and Deportation Facilities are evil. Private Healthcare is a waste of taxpayer money. Student Loans are an unconscionable trap. All of these are things Biden's party, even Biden himself, foisted on us decades ago and continue to lie about to this day on multiple levels.

    Pizza-gate was a quaint joke of a lie by comparison to the shit sandwich the DNC demands we swallow in excange for keeping the oligarchy/fascism we've had all along behind closed doors. So sad for you that our governments rhetoric will now openly boast about the things you've been comfortable with all along.

  • Is this somehow an intentional choice or a feature? I consider it insane ...

    https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9436237

    @MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de (replaced with my own user profile, as I'm not trying to fill other users' inboxes for no real reason)(also, this somehow worked right when making this post, but not the original comment) [@MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de](/u/MachineFab812) https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9293054 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9620373 https://jlai.lu/comment/6487794

    While we're at it, am I missing at instance-agnostic method for linking posts as well?

    27
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MA
    MachineFab812 @discuss.tchncs.de
    Posts 3
    Comments 694