Also, people love to break what little rules it adheres to and claim "eh, it's already broken, so let me do this dumb thing a little further because Alicia said it was hella fetch." And that's why people can't pluralize "email" properly and why everyone under 40 knows no adverb but "literally".
I'm still confused as to why this was publically funded.
Over his time in office, Hair guy has made a bunch of against-theme policy decisions that to me seemed like an effort to curry favour with the rabid opposition. Taking on this boondoggle when it was only c$4bn seemed like more of the same.
C$34billion?!? What a gong show. And, like before, the opposition will use that gilded olive branch to beat him about the head and shoulders.
Having lived in Saanich and seen people fighting over street parking, is this a good idea? It seems like it'll just make it worse; and it's not like Saanich has good (ie rail-backed) transit or any kind of density that it can actually move to car-independent life.
This smells like another half-measure so that someone feels better about not actually addressing a problem of sprawl and asphalt .
So the dead and non-kiving trees will be cut so they don't fall down or kindle a fire.
And a group wanting to save the Dead trees wants that prevented.
I say put up a few mil as a bond against damage and fire response and we have a deal. If they're going to contravene what the experts say, they need to address the risk we're incurring for their love of dead trees.
Now do systemd. It'll be easier since it has nothing but fanboys. It's like Apple vs Android.