Zionism is a political, legal, moral, economical and social liability. If they won't stop supporting it, because that is the legal and moral thing to do, then they need to suffer consequences that make them stop supporting Zionism.
Like I have sugary coffee almost every day but I wouldn’t say I’m addicted because I’m not experiencing any negative consequences from it.
How would you feel/do, when there is a stressful day and you cannot have your coffee?
As for pot, i have met and been a daily smoker for many years. Everybody i knew that smoked daily had some social or personal issues and it definitely affected their ability to focus, memory and emotional awareness negatively.
I don't think that daily use of psychoactives can go without addiction. It can be beneficial as medication for some, but there will be side effects and withdrawal symptoms, like with non psychoactive medication too.
Jews lived mostly peaceful and Jewish communities were often thriving in Muslim majority countries. Things usually got bad when the "white European" Christians came, like during the crusades or the conquest of the Iberian peninsula. The same people whose descendants now want to blame their Antisemitism on Muslims and solve their Antisemitism by having "the Jews" live outside of their European home countries.
I think we can trust everyone involved to know exactly what the question meant and what the reply means.
If he would think in your categories he could have answered something like "I would be happy if it wouldn't be needed." Or reply back with "In which context?" or something.
He immediately jumped to making it "its either tanks or holocaust for us."
The representatives asked Wikimedia’s CEO, Maryana Iskander, for “assistance in obtaining documents and communications regarding individuals (or specific accounts) serving as Wikipedia volunteer editors who violated Wikipedia platform policies as well as your own efforts to thwart intentional, organized efforts to inject bias into important and sensitive topics.”
Klein described the study’s interpretation of the facts as “very skewed” and said it was reliant “on a faulty premise: that criticism of Israel or Zionism is inherently antisemitic.”
“To establish foul play, the ADL would need to demonstrate that Wikipedia content about Israel and Zionism regularly expresses as fact ideas that diverge from broadly held scholarly opinions on the matters in question,” Klein said. “But where is the evidence of editors repeatedly misrepresenting or contradicting peer-reviewed literature? There is none. The report simply wants us to take the ADL’s word for it.”
The obvious solution is to provide the House with information on all the Zionists trying to inject bias into topics.
US democrats for the most part are conservative/far right by EU political standards. Althoug we have seen a strong shift to the right in most EU countries political spectrum.
The ICJ is a court and as such slow. As for statements showing intent, there is a plethora of statements, from comparing Palestinians to biblical "Amalek" (Netanyahu), over saying it is "unfortunate" that the world won't let Israel just starve all people in Gaza to death (Ben Gvir) to public broadcast employees saying they want to commit another Holocaust in Gaza.
Boo @ Boo @lemmy.dbzer0.com Posts 1Comments 22Joined 5 days ago