The argument here seems to be completely eliminate elections like the British monarchy vs sham elections like Putin.
Either way it's bad for America.
It probably wasn't meant to.
But sham elections are still elections.
Arrested Development won't be nearly as funny when a banana is $10.
Similar thing happened with Hillary and the green energy jobs training.
Twitter didn't get to 250m users overnight. Give it some time.
Even when we have the actual venmo receipts for it.
He could try not being a Nazi cunt.
We've learned that you're an overly emotional dickweed, but that's about it.
Seems like they should run something federated on their own rather than just jumping to the next commercial version that's inevitably going to enshitify itself at some point.
You may be surprised to learn that Bibi wasn't on any ballots anywhere in the US.
You did have the option of voting for Harris who wants to pressure Israel into a cease fire or trump who wants Israel to finish off the Palestinians faster.
So, like the other guy already said, if you didn't vote for the one option who wanted to rein in the murder and also had a chance of getting more than 1% of the vote, you're an "untrustworthy person who is unserious about human rights or liberal values."
ml users are almost never worth engaging.
Sadly, you'll need to be more specific.
The national security risk is the one who picked her.
One of the restaurants by me let's you use either GrubHub or chownow when you order online. The prices are like 20% different between the two. It's been a while so I forget which one is the more expensive.
"Here's how Bernie could still win"
He's not the one with the copium addiction bro.