Plus, current climate change has seen a velocity across a mere century that prior events took tens of thousands of years to achieve.
This imparts an āinertiaā to our current climate that - even if we stopped on a dime, right now - will lead to conditions that may have most of the planet outside of the polar regions as being uninhabitable year-round due to chaotic weather and lethally high wet bulb temperatures that AC is simply unable to handle.
And if we donāt stop; if we continue on our ābusiness as usualā path for another 10 or 20 or 30 years, said inertia could conceivably push the entire planet over into a full-blown Venus Scenario, wiping all life from the face of the planet.
Warming trails CO2 by 15-20 years. We are now seeing the 1.5ā of warming of 2003, when Windows XP was released. If we hit CO2 levels that predict 5ā of warming, humanity has essentially dug its own grave, the planet will (once warming catches up) no longer have any carrying capacity for us to survive in sufficient numbers. If we hit CO2 levels that predict 8-10ā, we run a non-trivial possibility of a tip-over into a Venus Scenario.
Prior events took many tens to hundreds of thousands of years, allowing entire ecosystems to migrate to and from the poles. This allowed the biosphere to āput the brakes onā warming itself because they never stopped being robust sequesters of CO2.
We donāt have that in play, here. Entire ecosystems will die in-place because they simply donāt have the time to migrate. We will see extinctions on a scale never before seen in the geological record. And the very robust biosphere that saved the planet in prior warming events will be commensurately weakened in this one, likely to the point where it cannot effectively sequester sufficient CO2 to stop the warming.
TL;DR: as a species, the likelihood that we are all endlings is uncomfortably high. Humanity may not see the year 2100, and will most likely not see the year 2200.
The idea of climate change violates scripture of all three Abrahamic faiths. So the truly faithful will reject the idea of climate change wherever it is mentioned on ideology alone.
The science of climate change has also been adopted by āthe leftā, so the political right must stridently oppose its existence it wherever it is mentioned, on principle alone.
Thatās a majority of the population, right there, that will openly reject climate change in every way right up until it starves or kills them.
unfortunately sabilising global temperatures within the next century is a monumental challenge. One that capitalism simply won't allow. i applaud your optimism, but it's just realistically not going to happen.