An Excellent Analogy
An Excellent Analogy
Source (Via Xcancel)
An Excellent Analogy
Source (Via Xcancel)
These chucklefucks still don't get that they are gushing about using AI to replace to fucking good stuff that's fun to do.
Are they going to be waving the flags for AI football next? Who's playing sports anymore when AI can do it?
Of course the people who love this shite are the people who are using it to not pay real artists and want to profit from it's ability to crank out piles of mediocrity that gormless dumbasses will gobble down.
Or that if they succeed, no-one is going to hire a vibe artist. Why do that whwn they can just assign someone to generate images for them, and avoid having to hire someone?
Anyone else remember when they said the robots would take care of all the shitty work, so the rest of us could spend our days painting, or writing poetry?
Yeah. Turns out they're giving those jobs to the robots, while we do all the shitty work.
The AI """Art""" in question:
They really just don't understand that anyone who isn't a greedy sociopath just fucking hates them, huh.
I agree on everything but the last sentence because fear mongering literally enabled orange cheeto to become president for a second term 🤮
The issue is less the fear mongering and more the droves of people who are weak willed, afraid and too stupid to see how they are getting played.
They are colonisers. They will become tourists when they travel for pleasure.
AI is a tool. if it can help dropping in a drum track or something so you can eventually LEARN to do it yourself, cool. if it does the whole damn song so you don't have to do it yourself, go play it to a woodchipper
Sounds like the average D&D party
We said the exact same thing when all these smartphone people showed up on the internet and they never fucking left
How can you be "left behind" in art? I can make a cave painting right now and there would be nothing wrong or inherently bad about it.
Those people don't understand art. They think if it's faster to produce, it's inherently better. That's why they aren't artists, they are producers. And they don't produce art, they produce content marketed as art. Which is a totally different thing.
Which is obvious because they call AI images "art." They're not. AI images are patterns to fit a mathematical probability. It's the difference between calling a Jackson Pollock and a QR code art.
They produce bullshit nobody cares about. I love to check how many ppl engage with it, and untill it's a plastic jesus doomerbait nobody cares.
Financially. It's always about money. That's why they care about it. They see in AI an opportunity to get rich quickly. But for that they need people to actually enjoy AI slop and thus we get posts like these.