There's still time. That said, that only happened to Mussolini because his government had been defeated militarily. I don't really see that happening in the US.
What I always find most striking about this picture is the insane, obvious, over-the-top evilness of it. But then I remember that at the time there was no prior insane evilness for that kind of iconography to be associated with. It's a design language, a trend, and just like anything else it can be popular or unpopular depending on the context. One decade baggy pants look cool, then they look stupid, then they look cool again, and so on. At the time that that first went on display, it probably didn't seem so obviously evil.
For a long time I thought the most valuable lesson that picture can teach is that evil can always wear a new disguise, and a mere visual similarity is not enough to identify it. You have to be able to look behind the disguise and see what is really there.
But it seems that this generation of evil is not so creative.
I think the common thing is they want to show power. They probably thought of it that way and not that they are trying to project evil.
Modern day military imagery is all about Spartans and swords and Roman things, and they just think it's badass. Sparta's military wasn't that good, and they were considered barbaric even by Bronze Age standards, throwing babies off cliffs etc. They think they're the good guys.
When it comes to stripping their union rights, cutting their pay, removing workplace safety laws, increasing their cost of healthcare, ignoring new job creation projects because they're "woke" or "dei." That comes first!
There is a reason Nazis called themselves national socialist at the time. Socialism wasn't a "scary" term yet and was associated with workers movements and positive material outcomes of revolution against oppressive states.
They are just using the terms and phrases people associate with positive change.
Fascist don't care if they are called liars. They thrive off of people thinking they will be stopped by pointing to their hypocrisy. The only language they understand is violence. It's why our liberal institutions will continue to fail as they attempt to fight them with the very systems and structures that gave them power in the first place.
Reactionaries never have the self-awareness to ask that question. It's always the "woke left" (or whatever the euphemism of the day) that drove them to this.
Mussolini energy
Kind of ironic that Apple gave Trump a trophy
Shame Americans won’t give him the same retirement.
There's still time. That said, that only happened to Mussolini because his government had been defeated militarily. I don't really see that happening in the US.
Andross is a bitch!
What I always find most striking about this picture is the insane, obvious, over-the-top evilness of it. But then I remember that at the time there was no prior insane evilness for that kind of iconography to be associated with. It's a design language, a trend, and just like anything else it can be popular or unpopular depending on the context. One decade baggy pants look cool, then they look stupid, then they look cool again, and so on. At the time that that first went on display, it probably didn't seem so obviously evil.
For a long time I thought the most valuable lesson that picture can teach is that evil can always wear a new disguise, and a mere visual similarity is not enough to identify it. You have to be able to look behind the disguise and see what is really there.
But it seems that this generation of evil is not so creative.
I think the common thing is they want to show power. They probably thought of it that way and not that they are trying to project evil.
Modern day military imagery is all about Spartans and swords and Roman things, and they just think it's badass. Sparta's military wasn't that good, and they were considered barbaric even by Bronze Age standards, throwing babies off cliffs etc. They think they're the good guys.