I see. So I think if I just let my eyes graze down the text without reading too much in particular, I can imagine I’m in a courtroom gallery, and someone with neither attorney nor soap is standing up rattling off nonsense, while some well-pressed district attorney is cackling in her head, at a nearby table?
And that the judge is gonna throw this poor unwashed defendant right off Hell in a Cell, and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcer’s table.
This is not a failing of your English. This person has strung together a long torrent of barely recognizable words, many of which are fabrications of the "Sovereign Citizen" movement (read; delusion).
These are not real legal precedents, or even genuine legal actions one can take. He broke some law, and is saying that because he is a Sovereign Citizen that he is not beholden to said law.
It's an interesting and challenging puzzle in itself... reading through their delusional perspective, and trying to intuit or guess what was actually happening in reality during their court appearances.
The 10.77 implies that the defendant may not be mentally competent for trial. Which is what anybody would probably assume after hearing them ramble on like that.
Yep it sounds like this guy is going to be declared incompetent for trial, which means he spends the rest of his life in a psych ward until he gets declared competent.