In May, legendary Apple designer Jony Ive hooked up with OpenAI to announce an unspecified gadget. [WSJ, archive] To promote this complete vaporware, OpenAI released a video of Sam Altman and Ive b…
It's funny how just today in a completely unrelated context a generative ai enthusiast used an example of OpenAI getting sued by NYT as a reason why they wouldn't commit some other malfeasance because they'd get caught if they did.
Almost sounds as if in order to steal intellectual property, they had to go down the "traditional" route of talking to someone, making promises etc. If it turns out that a chatbot isn't the best tool for plagiarizing something, what is it even good for?