Fired Michigan cop's attorney argues 'fleeing felon' rule justified killing man who was lying face down on the ground by shooting him in the back of the head
When the town I lived in got tasers, we were told they would ONLY be a last resort, to keep an officer from needing to use a pistol to stop a threat. The very next quarter, their training mostly covered how to use it to get compliance from suspects…
When I was with an ex of mine, the cops were at her house because her sister got attacked at school, as I walked down to the house one of the cops saw me, put his hand on his tazer and stared me down the whole time he was there.
Do you know how many times, I had to re-read that, to in anyway see the defenses logic to that at all, and I still can't make sense of it... WTF to the attorney
The lawyer is trying to get him off on a technicality? "Well, your honor, the law does not say that the suspect has to pose a danger to the officer, just that they be fleeing arrest. My client was well within his legal rights to gun the violent thug… I mean victim, down."
Video shows Schurr wrestling with 26-year-old Lyoya before firing his weapon into the back of Lyoya's head. The video appears to show Lyoya trying to gain control of the officer's stun gun, with Schurr shouting "Let go of the Taser" before firing the fatal shot.
But also that he shot the suspect while the suspect was face down on the ground.
Except the first (the fact that the shot was fired during a fight) is based on video footage. The second (that the suspect was down on the ground) is.how the prosecutor explained it. I assume the ex-officer knows the first rule of what to do after you are arrested: shut up and let your lawyer speak on your behalf.
That guy has "disgraced cop" written all over him. He totally looks like the sort of creepy a-hole who would shoot a guy in the back of the head, and expect to get away with it.