AI revolution

We can use AI to make Star Wars better

By fixing the dialogue?

....

By fixing the dialogue, right?

WE WANT DARTH JAR JAR!
- With big boomers!
- The fuck we do. Fuck darth jar jar, stupidest shit I’ve ever heard of.
  Ok, second stupidest shit behind the sequels, especially TLJ. But a strong second.
  They should have stopped at the OT instead of making only garbage afterwards.

I hate this image so much.

While the punchline is funny, it's probably worth at least likewise considering that Natalie Portman's experience with her first film resulted in – at 13 years old – being sexualized pretty much instantaneously, an experience which may've (I can't find any quotes confirming or denying) impacted how she negotiates with nudity in roles she takes throughout her career.

The worst ones off the top of my head were Spears and Emma Watson. Holy crap the sleazy press crowed when they turned “legal”. It was pretty gross. No shortage of sketchy leering photographs when they were under age, too.
- The olsen twins were also caught in the same nonsense.
  That was extra fucked up, as they had been public figures since they were toddlers.
I have considered it. Thanks.

Genuine support for increasing breast size of everything. My fridge could use some improvements.

Nice extra compartments for storing the milk.
Organic milk, even.

Right, Ani?? Ani you've hardly touched your picnic food items ANIIIIiieeuyyhh🤖

Ani, are you okay? So, Ani, are you okay? Are you okay, Ani? Ani, are you okay? Will you tell us that you′re okay?
- does a jedi flip
  \ You've been hit by
  \ You've been hit by
  \ A smooth jedi council!
  AUH!!

I dont want to pick a fight but i hope people who upvote this while believing everything ai is bad reflect on the fact that this meme was made using ai.

My point is ai is often used in bad ways but not automatically and pointing out proper use exists gets people angry.

"I don't want to pick a fight"
picks a fight
- To be fair, just because you don't want to do something doesn't mean you won't do it
- Yeah, they're clearly picking a fight, aren't they? cracks knuckles
It's a tool, it can have good and bad uses. But what's interesting is the "dreams" of those who invested in the first place, their objectives: cheap labor, capitalist expansion. And the means to achieve it: ignore copyright like hypocrites.
Sure, the tool is here. "Confetti left the cannon". Now, what is everyone doing with it? Good and bad uses, of course. But that's beyond the point of the critique.
This falacy is quite common, "science is like a hammer". Only those who never studied the least of social sciences or human history believe such thing (including most exact and natural scientists.. •sigh•)
- See also: Do artifacts have politics?
And exactly those often times it's bad. Generative AI is bullshit pushed by ai bros to replace good work and the Human touch.
ML on the other hand isn't even called AI and I used most of the times in good and relevant scientific ways.