I hope all of these false advertising fast food places get successfully sued. Should have happened decades ago. Truth in advertising or something.
Yeah, "For Illustration Purpose" is a bad defence and anyone use that should feel bad.
The trouble is, even if they do get sued, they won't tone down their ads or increase the quality of their food, they'll just put more disclaimer text in small print below the ad
On what planet is a fried chicken sandwich a burger?
Spotted the American.
"fried chicken sandwich" outside America vs "chicken burger" seems to depend on whether you use a burger bun or not, at least that's my observation. The secondary observation is that for dietary reasons a lot of places don't primarily think of burgers as exclusively beef or pork so the swap/substitution is already well underway for what makes a burger patty/filling.
(ETA: so by the time our English settled on understanding a burger is a sandwich using burger buns, then just about anything in the middle can sub for a meat patty)
(Also, you have to go out more.)
In Malaysia, because language is a funni thing 🤷
Sate? More like sad-take
Nice one 🙈
If they want to make it satay burger at least the chicken should be grilled lol.
Right? Like Prosperity but with satay sauce.
Also, who wants satay sauce on fried chicken? Sorry, satay needs to be made from flame-grilled mutton and I stick with it.
Also, hi from your annoying neighbour. :P
No family is safe
When I Satay!
