The Walrus: Poilievre’s stand against securing his top-level security clearance has emerged as one of the more baffling moments of this early election season. What’s driving his irrational response?
Pierre Poilievre’s defiant stand against securing his top-level security clearance has emerged as one of the more baffling moments of this early election season. What’s driving his seemingly irrational response to a standard procedure? https://thewalrus.ca/poilievres-refusal-to-get-security-clearanc...
Pierre Poilievre’s defiant stand against securing his top-level security clearance has emerged as one of the more baffling moments of this early election season. What’s driving his seemingly irrational response to a standard procedure? thewalrus.ca/poilievres-refus...
Imagine applying for a job as a pilot and being like "yeah I defined want the job, but you can't drug test me, but trust me bro I'll fly sober every time."
This alone should be disqualifying in an election where the central issue facing the country is preservation of sovereignty and when we know foreign interference is a substantial concern. It's made even worse when considering that it's the movement supported by a segment of his base that is threatening Canadian sovereignty, and when we know that a segment of his base are would-be willing defectors.