Yeah, ethics (and probably legality) have been out of the equation for a while now. The US are not officially at war. Very peaceful, much friendly. Too many precedents now...
Still I suppose trying to keep the leaders accountable for some of their actions is somewhat positive.
This stuff has already been happening for a while.
Back in Obama times when extrajudicial executions by drone started to be a thing, the civilian casualties numbers were so bad that they even changed the definition of "enemy combatant" when counting casualties to be "any male of military age".
The tools and mindset when it comes to murder abroad that the current batch of assholes are using have been in place and used for more than a decade.
Back in Obama times when extrajudicial executions by drone started to be a thing
Obama gets a lot of shit for this, and plenty of it is deserved. But I think people fixate on "execution by drone" while forgetting Bush Jr and prior administrations tended to use hellfire missiles launched from manned black-hawk helicopters to the same effect.
the civilian casualties numbers were so bad that they even changed the definition of “enemy combatant” when counting casualties to be “any male of military age”.
I believe this was the standard during the original Bush Jr Iraq invasion. Also... go back to the US invasions and interventions in Nicaragua, Vietnam, Korea, and the Balkins... hell, straight back to the WWs, and you're going to see people playing very fast and loose with the definition of "combatant". Military officers have never been picky about collateral damage before. What's largely changed has been the post-Vietnam media coverage, as a rebuttal to the photography and video journalism that emerged from that era.
We have to say we're only killing "enemy combatants" now, because we want to preemptively rebut the claim that we did another Mai Ly Massacre or Hadditha.
The tools and mindset when it comes to murder abroad
And now we're seeing the mindset come home, perhaps in a way we haven't experienced since Blair Mountain.
What’s being reported… is that the national security folks believe that most all top level officials already have enemy nation states ease dropping on their personal phones. Especially if, say… you’re in their country (like one of the members of the signal chat was, in Russia specifically, during the signal chat episode).
Signal may be safe for us normies, but if your device is already compromised because you’re a high value target, especially if you’re in their lair, then there isn’t much good that’ll do for you.
Yeah, if you device is compromised, the apps on it are obviously as well.
But that still doesn't affect Signal as a network directly.
Which is imho a important distinction, as else all my communications could be compromised as well
Not saying that this isn't a threat vector, but it's not like my communications are automatically compromised, like with a bug or hacked signal server infrastructure
Yeah the NSA (and your other favorite cyber/sigint agencies) will just use the easiest attack vector of your phone, which is usually iOS, Android and its many other apps, root it and read all your app messages anyway.
I mean that assumes you are a target of high value worth throwing stuff like the Pegasus spyware at, but at that point you really should just be using a dedicated handheld computer with a sim adapter for network connectivity, and not practically almost every smartphone on the planet, even if you somehow coaxed it to use postmarket OS lol.