I mean, look I'm not going to contend there isn't sexism or persistent and structural approaches to disenfranchisement of women..
but in this example a woman, suing another woman, over whether or not the ghost of the estate of the first woman can claim rights to the work that the second woman penned (the second woman also claimed he ghost penned the work, or steered i guess?)
If anyone's being disenfranchised in this story that I think even Scooby Doo would struggle with, it's the ghost of Samuel Clemens.
More broadly, does your estate have rights to that which your spirit creates in the afterlife?