The OBS Studio open-source screencasting and streaming app has called out Fedora's poor Flatpak packaging of the application and is threatening as going as far as legal action if it isn't addressed.
Because with the immutable distros .rpm isn't a good match but they still want to make use of their own controls and security regarding packages. Fedora Flatpaks are built from Fedora rpms.
This security of their own caused them to update an EOL runtime into a newer version that had regressions and caused OBS to not function properly leading to the article in the OP.
After the article posted the Fedora flatpak maintainer and OBS has made plans to talk about the situation on Matrix, so I think it'll all solve itself nicely in the end.
What is good is users having a choice, but Fedora Flatpaks are the default choice and users have no way to change it. Many don't even realize they are using them instead of the official ones from Flathub.
Honestly they should make it closer to F-droid. They already have only Foss software on it now all they need to do is implement strong privacy and security rules.
There's probably more to the story as to why Fedora started their own flatpak repo in the first place. I can't imagine it was for shits and giggles. Anybody have insight into this?