The system is working exactly as intended and must be destroyed

"I never experienced another system and suddenly realize that the current system isn't perfect. My solution: let's tear everything down"

-- every teenager who just started to understand the world

"I'm such a douchebag entitled narcissist so I'm going to plug my ears and go 'na na na this is fine' as the system destroys EVERY GODDAMN FUCKING FACET of society and whatever future these 'teenagers' may have. BUT IT'S THE TEENAGERS THAT ARE TO BLAME, RIGHT?"
Get off your fucking high horse. Jesus fucking christ dude.
- You know, the post that you're responding to could just be highlighting a parallel rather than being a criticism of the OP.
- and go 'na na na this is fine'
  that's not what I wrote and you suggesting it tells a lot about how you look at the world and people around you.
  Keep on memeing, dude. You'll surely make the world a better place...
- Gonna cry?
Yeah also don't understand that any system involving humans is never going to be perfect because people will find a way to screw it up. That doesn't mean you give up on improving it of course, more the opposite. Every system will constantly require effort to improve or it will degrade over time.
There is no such thing as a perfect system, but that means there will always be ways to improve the existing system, no matter what the existing system is. The "tear it down and start over" mentality makes people useless in efforts to actually make things better. Perfect is the enemy of good.
I never experienced another system and have come to the gradual realisation that the current system is inherently exploitative, values some people above others, and leaves very little hope for a future as it continues to render the planet's surface less habitable by the year. My solution: let's tear the system down before it tears all of us down with it.
FTFY.
- My solution: let's tear the system down before it tears all of us down with it.
  "...without having any clue about what comes next, blindly hoping that it will rule out injustice and inherent exploitation although there is no precedence or vision by anyone."
  This is not a fix. It's calling to kill the complete herd for a few sick animals while others take enormous efforts to find a cure.
- you've never experienced another, vastly superior system (like, for example, Germany)
  ??? Germany is not another system, it's just capitalism with some touches of socialism
- any suggestions
  I must have missed something. I just read a suggestion to destroy everything in a mediocre anime meme.
  This sounds like trying to burn down the school when you got a bad grade but when you're caught and called to the principal's office, you claim to be the victim of a coldhearted and overgeneralizing grade system.
  Also, no one even mentioned the US.

Destroyed and replaced by?

People fail to realize that socialism isn't just an ideology but a process. It involves looking back at previous attempts and learning from their mistakes and improving.
- Hey, you cut it out with that education! How are people supposed to falsly believe that socialism is China or Russia or Vuvuzela if you go around explaining how it's not?
- Is every ideology also a process where people learn from their past attempts at achieving the ideology?
- That’s what capitalism is for😎
- Sounds like fixing to me
- The fun part is that you're on lemmy and I'm surprised no one has called you a conservative yet. This is because all of your ideas involve keeping the current system, and many people around here specifically want full socialism, Marxism, what have you
- Hold up I asked what political sistem would replace it. Lol not what changes we want no matter the system you are on
Versus doing nothing? Lemmy is fucking ass lately, shitting all over hyperbole while rolling over and letting capitalism and pessimism run your sorry, sad fucking lives.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialdemocracy
- Which is a fix, not possible to implement in the chaos after a revolution, and not remotely a replacement.
I will ask the questions, comrade
Nothing.
Well, nothing where a human is in charge. I'd rather let Bing AI take the wheel. AI isn't greedy or ambitious for one so no need to go full totalitarian like every single revolution.
- AI isn't greedy
  yet. I heard AIs are trained with data from humans who are... whoops!
Let's iterate!
Worker ownership over the means of production
(Not a huge fan of centralized planning since that tends to lead to authoritarianism)

aka building dual power

Oh tankies...

- No, but proposing to destroy a system in which you are presumably living relatively comfortably, in exchange for something else is some extremely privileged bullshit to say. E.g. go tell that to the people in Niger.

The systems not broken it was built this way.

That's the whole fucking joke, bruv
- redditors..

Punchline title.

Good meme tho.

It's a glass-half-full, glass-half-empty situation. Both viewpoints are correct. The question is: which is easier? Fixing a broken system or destroying the system and creating a new one?

Raze everything to the ground and start new.
- Usually the result of that is something just as bad or even worse.

...if you have a way to put a new, better system in place to replace the old one.

Historically, has that ever happened?
If I'm not mistaken, the usual cycle seems to be dismantling an existing system due to grievances unaddressed, seeking a consolidation of power, or other political machinations, attempts at forming & establishing new systems for a period of time, until eventually some system emerges that manages to survive for some time but its persistence is not assured.

Precisely

At least in the US is proveably isn't working as intended. Section 1983 of the federal code was illegally modified in 1874 by one person that had no authority to do so. That revision is what "decided" Harlow V Fitzgerald in 1982. That case should have found that the 1871 Congress had outlawed any immunity from prosecution for civil servants of any kind.

This is also similar to how "corporate personhood" became a legal fictive, yet legal precedent.

The system isn't working as intended at all, and the consequences of those two minor "revisions" has allowed the rich to buy the government.